Skip to the story
All stories

Josh Hawley Investigates Flock Safety Over Data Practices

Senator probes license plate reader company's data collection and dissemination policies.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
A Flock Safety license plate reader is seen along a public road, Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025, in Houston. (AP Photo/David Goldman, File)

What this story says

  • U.S. Senator Josh Hawley is investigating Flock Safety, a company that operates a network of license plate reader cameras.
  • The investigation concerns Flock Safety's policies for collecting, retaining, and sharing data gathered by its cameras.
  • Hawley stated that Congress has not authorized the industry-wide network of license plate readers.
  • St. Charles County Police will cease using Flock technology after a civilian improperly accessed data.

Who covered it

Left 12%(5)Centre 40%(18)Right 48%(19)

Percentages are shares of the 42 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 5 of the 47 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

50/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

20/100

47 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 5 of the 42 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Missouri U.S. Senator Josh Hawley has initiated an investigation into Flock Safety, a technology firm that supplies license plate reader cameras to law enforcement agencies. The inquiry, led by a Senate Judiciary subcommittee chaired by Hawley, centres on the company's practices regarding the collection, retention, and dissemination of data captured by its cameras.

Hawley expressed concerns that the company's internal policies serve as the primary safeguards for Americans' data, as Congress has not formally authorised the widespread use of such technology. He stated that the public is increasingly aware of these practices and seeking answers from elected officials. In a related development, the St. Charles County Police department announced it would stop using Flock technology following an incident where a civilian improperly accessed data. The department will continue to use other providers with what it describes as more stringent access protocols.

Disagreement on company response

A spokesperson for Flock Safety stated that the company looks forward to working with the subcommittee to offer further context on its technology, its built-in safeguards, and how law enforcement agencies utilise Flock to solve crimes and locate missing individuals. The reports do not contain any statement from the company regarding this specific inquiry.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated reports mention the St. Charles County Police decision to stop using Flock technology after a civilian improperly accessed data.

Coverage settled. We checked this 26 times and stopped on 1 Sept 2026, 11:45. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Daily Caller News Foundation
Independent Journal ReviewRight

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

5 rated outlets

  • The left-rated outlets Mashable and Courthouse News Service reported that Senator Josh Hawley is investigating Flock Safety. Mashable reported that Hawley sent a letter to the company demanding answers about its data collection and retention policies.
  • Mashable detailed Hawley's concerns that Flock cameras conduct billions of scans monthly and that the data is searchable in a national database. The report also highlighted instances of data misuse, including police using the database for stalking and incorrect alerts leading to wrongful imprisonment.
  • Mashable also listed specific questions Hawley posed to Flock, including details on customer access to data, data retention periods, and Flock's measures of accuracy. The outlet noted Hawley's demand for answers by September 8.

Centre

18 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated outlets reported that Senator Josh Hawley launched an investigation into Flock Safety's data practices. They stated his inquiry focused on the company's surveillance network and access to personal data. Hawley sent a letter to the company demanding answers about its safeguards.
  • Reports mentioned Flock Safety cameras are used in 49 states, with over 120,000 cameras scanning billions of vehicles monthly. Several outlets noted Hawley's concern that most scanned individuals are not involved in wrongdoing. They also highlighted his view that the company's internal policies are the primary safeguards.
  • Full reports from Spectrum Local News and KMIZ detailed Hawley's quote that Americans do not surrender privacy rights when driving. They also included Flock Safety's statement looking forward to working with the subcommittee. KMIZ also cited examples of alleged misuse and false positives from Flock cameras.

Right

19 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports focused on Senator Josh Hawley launching an investigation into Flock Safety over surveillance concerns. Multiple reports highlighted Hawley's statement that Congress never authorised the network and that the company's internal policies are the only safeguards for Americans' data. Some reports mentioned Hawley's request for internal records from the company, detailing its roughly 120,000 devices. The Independent Journal Review also included details from Hawley's letter about specific instances of alleged misuse, such as an officer searching his girlfriend's license plate multiple times and a case where a driver faced charges for a crime she did not commit. This report also noted legislative efforts by other Republican representatives to ban or restrict the use of such cameras.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Josh Hawley Investigates Flock Safety Over Data Practices?
Of the 42 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 12% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 48% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 47. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Josh Hawley Investigates Flock Safety Over Data Practices left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 42 rated outlets on this story, 12% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 48% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Josh Hawley Investigates Flock Safety Over Data Practices biased?
Josh Hawley Investigates Flock Safety Over Data Practices is one event reported by 47 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Josh Hawley Investigates Flock Safety Over Data Practices?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Josh Hawley Investigates Flock Safety Over Data Practices?
47 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why is Senator Josh Hawley investigating Flock Safety?
Senator Josh Hawley is investigating Flock Safety due to concerns about the company's data collection, retention, and dissemination policies. He stated that Congress has not authorised the network of license plate readers and that the company's internal policies are the primary safeguards for Americans' privacy.
What prompted the St. Charles County Police to stop using Flock technology?
St. Charles County Police decided to stop using Flock technology after a civilian improperly accessed data from the system. The department indicated it would continue using other providers that it states have stricter access protocols in place.
What is Flock Safety?
Flock Safety is a company that provides license plate reader cameras to law enforcement agencies across the United States. These cameras are designed to capture vehicle information, and the company's data handling practices are currently under scrutiny.

Read it at the source

48 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

6

Centre

18
Show 10 more

Right

19
Show 11 more

Not rated

5

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Josh Hawley Investigates Flock Safety | MediaBias News