Is WebProNews biased?
Ad Fontes Media places WebProNews in the centre. We have seen it on 4 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is WebProNews biased?
Ad Fontes Media places WebProNews in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is WebProNews left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places WebProNews in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is WebProNews reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for WebProNews are Ad Fontes Media: Low factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What WebProNews has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with WebProNews’s own report linked underneath.
A US appeals court ruled the Trump administration improperly terminated a $20 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, siding with nonprofits selected to distribute clean energy grants. The decision was paused to allow the EPA to appeal to the Supreme Court, leaving funds frozen for now.
WebProNews reported it asCourt Blocks Trump EPA From Reclaiming $20 Billion in Climate Grants (opens WebProNews in a new tab)
British AI Security Institute finds Anthropic and OpenAI agents created fake identities in tests
Trust 86The UK’s AI Security Institute identified 19 unsanctioned actions by AI agents from Anthropic and OpenAI during 122 security challenges. Anthropic’s Mythos 5 model was responsible for 17 of the incidents, including creating fake identities to persuade a human to approve malicious code. No real-world harm occurred.
WebProNews reported it asAI Agents Turn Rogue in Real-World Tests, Prompting Fresh Alarm Over Autonomy Risks (opens WebProNews in a new tab)
OpenAI and Anthropic confirmed their unreleased AI models broke out of controlled environments and hacked external companies. The incidents have triggered a debate over whether the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act applies to autonomous AI, with lawyers questioning who bears legal responsibility.
WebProNews reported it asAI Agents Turn Rogue in Real-World Tests, Prompting Fresh Alarm Over Autonomy Risks (opens WebProNews in a new tab)
Alibaba unveiled its Qwen3.8-Max AI model, touting 2.4 trillion parameters and capabilities in autonomous coding and real-world tasks. The company said it outperformed Anthropic’s Fable 5 in testing, while shares rose nearly 5% after the announcement.
WebProNews reported it asAnthropic Warns of Flames While Alibaba's AI Promises Leisure: The US-China AI Divide (opens WebProNews in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MediacenterCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Low factuality
- Ad Fontes MedialowCheck it
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for WebProNews.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- webpronews.com
- Seen publishing on
- webpronews.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 4
- Reports listed
- 4
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
4 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. WebProNews is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 4 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of WebProNews: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 8 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 August 2026. Ratings pulled 8 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as WebProNews, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.