Skip to the story
All stories

OpenAI Bans Russian and Iranian Accounts for Influence Operations

Company reports disruption of campaigns using AI to spread disinformation and plant fake news.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
OpenAI Bans Russian and Iranian Accounts for Influence Operations

What this story says

  • OpenAI has banned accounts involved in Russian and Iranian influence operations that used its AI tools.
  • The Russian operation, dubbed 'Dark Clark', targeted Latin America with disinformation and political influence campaigns.
  • Iranian operatives used AI to generate approximately 100 articles critical of the US war against Iran, planting them in about a dozen outlets.
  • The company reported that the Russian campaign was the most far-reaching influence operation it has disrupted to date.

Who covered it

Left 28%(8)Centre 55%(16)Right 17%(5)

Percentages are shares of the 29 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 29 of the 58 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

41/100

58 sources · methodology

Artificial intelligence company OpenAI announced on Thursday that it had banned accounts linked to two influence operations originating from Russia and Iran. These operations leveraged OpenAI's AI tools, including ChatGPT, to create fake journalist identities and disseminate propaganda. The Russian campaign, identified as 'Dark Clark', focused on spreading disinformation across Latin America to undermine support for Ukraine and influence local politics. The Iranian operation involved generating approximately 100 articles critical of the US war against Iran and planting them in about a dozen media outlets worldwide.

OpenAI stated that the Russian operation was the most far-reaching influence campaign it has disrupted to date. This campaign reportedly involved impersonating a regional educational authority in Peru to organize activities featuring a controversial historical figure, Stepan Bandera, which led to a public response from a political figure in the European Parliament. The Russian operatives also allegedly ran a fake think tank in Latin America, recruiting unwitting researchers to compose reports.

The Iranian operatives used AI to tweak articles and editorial pitches, and generate social media comments. The articles produced by the Iranian campaign often carried provocative titles, such as "Is America’s Iran Policy Being Privatized? The Jared Kushner Question," and "The Iran War and the Collapse of Western Moral Credibility." OpenAI noted that while the overall activity appeared consistent with a commercial actor running a for-hire influence campaign, it was unable to identify the specific actor involved.

Disagreements in reporting

Reports differ on the specific number of outlets that published articles from the Iranian operation. KIFI and KRDO, citing CNN, state that about a dozen outlets ran roughly 100 articles. However, The Washington Post digest states that ChatGPT users in Iran made more than 100 fake articles published across at least 20 news outlets. NBC News reports that the Russian campaign is the most far-reaching influence operation OpenAI has disrupted.

What the coverage left out

None of the left, centre, or right-rated reports printed below mention the specific figure of approximately 100 articles by seven fake journalists that OpenAI stated were published across about a dozen outlets worldwide. The full reports from KIFI and NPR do mention this figure, but it is not present in the digests of the other rated outlets.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 9 Oct 2026, 10:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

OpenAI Bans Russian and Iranian Accounts for Influence Operations
nprLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

8 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports led on OpenAI's disruption of both Russian and Iranian influence operations. Multiple outlets highlighted that the Russian campaign targeted Latin America to undermine support for Ukraine and influence local politics, with NPR detailing how it involved impersonating an educational authority and prompted a response from a European Parliament member. The Iranian operation's use of AI to plant articles critical of the US war against Iran in US media was also a key focus, with IndexHR noting the placement of about a hundred anti-war articles. Some reports, like La Stampa, described the fake journalists as "anti-Ukraine or 'pacifist'." Georgia Public Broadcasting and NBC News specifically mentioned the Russian operation's reach and its use of ChatGPT to update superiors.

Centre

16 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports focused on OpenAI banning accounts involved in Russian and Iranian influence operations using AI. Several outlets, including KIFI, KEZI 9 News, KVIA, and KEYT, citing CNN, reported that Iranian operatives used AI to plant articles critical of the US war against Iran in multiple US media outlets. The number of articles, around 100 by seven fake journalists across about a dozen outlets, was frequently mentioned. The Hill noted that the Russian operation had the greatest reach recorded by OpenAI. NPR's report was also cited by some centre-rated outlets, highlighting the Russian campaign's targeting of Latin America and its use of AI.

Right

5 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports highlighted OpenAI's disruption of influence operations by Russia and Iran, with headlines such as "OpenAI says Iran, Russia influence ops busted" from The Straits Times and Free Malaysia Today News. The Washington Examiner reported that OpenAI banned 'false front' influence operations in Russia and Iran. Le Figaro's digest described the operations as ChatGPT being hijacked by Russian and Iranian propagandists. The use of ChatGPT to peddle sophisticated propaganda against adversaries was a common theme across these reports.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover OpenAI Bans Russian and Iranian Accounts for Influence Operations?
Of the 29 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 28% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 17% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 58. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is OpenAI Bans Russian and Iranian Accounts for Influence Operations left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 29 rated outlets on this story, 28% are rated left, 55% are rated centre, 17% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of OpenAI Bans Russian and Iranian Accounts for Influence Operations biased?
OpenAI Bans Russian and Iranian Accounts for Influence Operations is one event reported by 58 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered OpenAI Bans Russian and Iranian Accounts for Influence Operations?
58 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did OpenAI announce?
OpenAI announced that it had banned accounts linked to Russian and Iranian influence operations. These operations used OpenAI's AI tools, like ChatGPT, to create fake journalist personas and spread disinformation, including planting fake news articles in media outlets.
What was the Russian influence operation?
The Russian operation, named 'Dark Clark', targeted Latin America with disinformation aimed at undermining support for Ukraine and influencing local politics. OpenAI described it as the most far-reaching influence operation it has disrupted to date, involving a fake think tank and prompting political responses.
What was the Iranian influence operation?
Iranian operatives used AI to generate approximately 100 articles critical of the US war against Iran and plant them in about a dozen media outlets globally. They also used AI to generate social media comments to amplify their narratives.
How many fake articles were published?
OpenAI stated that approximately 100 articles were published by seven fake journalists across about a dozen outlets worldwide as part of the Iranian influence operation. The Russian operation also involved spreading false narratives, though a specific article count was not provided.

Read it at the source

58 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

8

Centre

16
Show 8 more

Right

5

Not rated

29
Show 21 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

OpenAI Bans Russian, Iranian Accounts | MediaBias News