Women's Health media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media places Women's Health as leaning left. We have seen it on 1 published story of ours.
The short answers
Is Women's Health biased?
Ad Fontes Media places Women's Health as leaning left. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Women's Health left or right?
Ad Fontes Media places Women's Health as leaning left. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Left.
Is Women's Health reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Women's Health. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Women's Health has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Women's Health’s own report linked underneath.
Drinking very hot beverages, defined as 65C or above, triples the risk of oesophageal cancer compared to warm drinks, according to a large Oxford University study. Consuming six or more hot drinks a day also increases the risk, though the overall likelihood of developing the cancer remains low.
Women's Health reported it asVery hot drinks linked to higher cancer risk in study of 1 million people – what 'very hot' actually means (opens Women's Health in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Ad Fontes MedialeanLeftCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Women's Health.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Sacramento, Sacramento County, California, United States
- Official site
- womenshealthmag.com
- Seen publishing on
- womenshealthmag.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 1
- Reports listed
- 1
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 11 September 2026
1 of those reports was paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
We have not seen Women's Health cover a story that outlets rated left were largely absent from.
On the one story of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Women's Health: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 11 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 11 September 2026. Ratings pulled 11 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Women's Health, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Women's Health publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.