Skip to the story
All stories

India wants veto power for all UNSC members

New Delhi argues for equal rights and responsibilities in a reformed Security Council.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
'Veto should be held by all permanent members': India at UN

What this story says

  • India has called for reforms to the UN Security Council, demanding that all permanent members of a reformed council should have equal veto rights.
  • India's permanent representative, Parvathaneni Harish, stated that the veto power should be exercised with restraint and not as a tool for narrow political interests.
  • Harish noted that the veto has been exercised 331 times on approximately 200 resolutions throughout the UN's history.
  • India also highlighted the existence of a 'de facto veto' through consensus, which can block decisions without formal use of the veto.

Who covered it

Left 0%(0)Centre 11%(1)Right 89%(8)

Percentages are shares of the 9 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 8 of the 17 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

76/100

Craft

72/100

Hype

28/100

17 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

None of the 9 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

India has called for comprehensive reforms of the United Nations Security Council, stating that all permanent members of a reformed council must have equal rights and responsibilities, including the veto power. Parvathaneni Harish, India's permanent representative to the UN, delivered the statement at the United Nations General Assembly. He argued that the veto should be used with restraint and not as an instrument for narrow political interests, particularly concerning international peace and security. India also opposes proposals for a separate category of permanent members without veto power, viewing such arrangements as deepening existing inequalities.

Harish stated that the veto has been exercised 331 times on around 200 resolutions in the UN's history. He noted that two of the five permanent members have not used the veto in over three and a half decades, while most vetoes or threats of vetoes have originated from only three of the permanent members. India also raised concerns about an 'effective or de facto veto' that can be exercised through the practice of consensus, allowing a single member to block presidential statements or decisions without a formal veto.

Disagreement on the number of vetoes

Parvathaneni Harish stated that the veto has been exercised 331 times on around 200 resolutions, according to the Times of India. Hindustan Times also reported Harish stating the veto has been exercised 331 times on around 200 resolutions. Other reports did not specify the exact number of times the veto has been exercised.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated reports or digests mention the specific number of resolutions on which the veto has been exercised, nor do they detail the 'de facto veto' mechanism discussed by India's representative. The centre-rated report from Hindustan Times also omits these specific details.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 27 Oct 2026, 05:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Centre

1 rated outlet

  • The Hindustan Times led on India's call for reforms and the equitable distribution of veto powers. It quoted India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish, stating that the veto should not be an instrument of narrow political expediency and that it carries an immense burden of responsibility requiring restraint. The report highlighted that the disproportionate exercise of veto power by a few members has undermined the Council's credibility. It also mentioned India's alignment with the Common African Position on UNSC reform.

Right

8 rated outlets

  • Reports from right-rated outlets focused on India's demand for equal veto rights for all permanent members of a reformed UN Security Council. Several reports highlighted India's stance that new permanent members without veto power would be 'second-class' citizens within the council, as reported by The Hindu Business Line and India Today. Moneycontrol and ABP News noted India's call for restraint in using the veto and its alignment with the Common African Position. Multiple right-rated outlets, including Deccan Chronicle and ANI, also mentioned India's statement that the veto should not be an instrument of narrow political expediency. NDTV reported India calling for equal veto rights in UN Security Council reform.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover India wants veto power for all UNSC members?
Of the 9 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 11% are rated centre, 89% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 17. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is India wants veto power for all UNSC members left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 9 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of India wants veto power for all UNSC members biased?
India wants veto power for all UNSC members is one event reported by 17 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting India wants veto power for all UNSC members?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered India wants veto power for all UNSC members?
17 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is India's position on veto power at the UN Security Council?
India advocates for comprehensive reforms of the UN Security Council, arguing that all permanent members of a reformed council should possess equal veto rights. India's permanent representative, Parvathaneni Harish, stated that the veto should be used with restraint and not for narrow political interests.
How many times has the veto been used at the UN?
According to India's permanent representative, Parvathaneni Harish, the veto has been exercised 331 times on approximately 200 resolutions throughout the UN's history. He noted that most vetoes have come from only three of the five permanent members.
What is the 'de facto veto' India mentioned?
India's representative highlighted a 'de facto veto' that operates through the practice of consensus within the Security Council. This allows a single member to block presidential statements or decisions without formally using the veto power, often without explanation.

Read it at the source

17 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Centre

1

Right

8

Not rated

8

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

India Calls for UNSC Reforms | MediaBias News