Skip to the story
All stories

CRISPR-edited beagles born without key allergy protein

Two hypoallergenic dogs, Bailey and Alfie, were created by switching off a gene in beagle skin cells

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
A dog catches a wave during the World Dog Surfing Championships, Saturday, Aug. 1, 2026, in Pacifica, Calif. (AP Photo/Haven Daley)

What this story says

  • Two beagles, Bailey and Alfie, were born in September 2024 after scientists used CRISPR to edit a gene responsible for producing the main allergy-causing protein in dogs.
  • The beagles’ saliva and hair tested negative for the key allergy protein, and a researcher with dog allergies showed no skin reaction to their samples.
  • The technique has not yet been tested on other dog breeds or service animals, and long-term health effects remain unclear.
  • No right-rated outlet carried the story, according to the reports below.

Who covered it

Left 32%(23)Centre 58%(41)Right 10%(7)

Percentages are shares of the 71 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 13 of the 84 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

66/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

15/100

84 sources · methodology

Scientists at Kindred Companion Sciences used CRISPR gene editing to produce two beagles, Bailey and Alfie, whose saliva and hair no longer contain the primary protein that triggers dog allergies in humans. The beagles were born in September 2024 from a surrogate beagle mother after researchers edited the genetic code in dog skin cells to switch off the gene responsible for the protein.

An allergy test was conducted on Matt Walker, a geneticist at Kindred Companion Sciences who suffers from dog allergies. His skin reacted to samples from a poodle and a goldendoodle but showed no reaction to samples from Bailey and Alfie. Walker, who had previously avoided dogs due to his allergies, now lives with Bailey in New York.

The research, published in the CRISPR Journal, marks the first successful use of this approach in dogs. The edited gene occurs naturally in some dogs, but the long-term health effects of the genetic tweak remain untested. Kindred Companion Sciences plans to apply the technique to other dog breeds and service animals.

The five left-rated digests and the Associated Press report led on the personal story of Matt Walker, the geneticist who could not previously own a dog due to allergies. The AP report quoted Walker directly: “The feeling right now is sort of a mix of relief and awe and gratitude that it worked.” The left-rated reports also included the ethical concerns raised by bioethicist Arthur Caplan, who said the technique “opens the door to a lot more people being able to own pets” but “may discourage people from trying to use strays and unwanted animals.”

The Associated Press report, carried by left-rated outlets, detailed the scientific process: editing the genetic code in dog skin cells, transferring it into eggs, and implanting them into a surrogate beagle. It also noted that previous attempts to create hypoallergenic pets, such as cloning, had led to genetically similar and sicker pups.

The 11 centre-rated digests and the Click on Detroit report, which reprinted the AP article, led on the scientific breakthrough and the potential for hypoallergenic dogs. The digests summarised the process: using CRISPR to switch off the gene responsible for the main allergy-causing protein in dogs. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the ethical concerns raised by Arthur Caplan or the personal story of Matt Walker’s allergies.

Click on Detroit’s full report included the same details as the AP article, such as the allergy test results and the long-term monitoring required for the beagles. It also carried the quote from Dr. Jeff SoRelle, a pathologist not involved in the study, who said, “we don’t exactly know just how effective or broadly useful this could be for stopping dog allergy in humans.”

No right-rated outlet carried the story, according to the reports printed below. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the ethical concerns raised by bioethicist Arthur Caplan about the potential impact on shelter and rescue animals. The left-rated digests did not include the quote from Dr. Jeff SoRelle questioning the broader effectiveness of the technique.

Coverage settled. We checked this 507 times and stopped on 13 Aug 2026, 08:45, including once after it resurfaced. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

23 rated outlets

  • The left-rated outlets led on the creation of two beagles, Alfie and Bailey, born without the primary protein that triggers dog allergies in humans. All seven reports stated that the gene responsible was switched off using CRISPR technology. Six digests and the Associated Press full report named the biotech company Kindred Companion Sciences and its geneticist Matt Walker as the team behind the work.
  • The Associated Press report included Walker’s personal experience with allergies and his ability to interact with Bailey without symptoms. It also quoted bioethicist Arthur Caplan on the potential impact on shelter animals, and pathologist Jeff SoRelle on the need for broader testing. None of the digests mentioned these expert voices or the ethical concerns raised.
  • Five digests and the Associated Press report noted that the technique is not yet commercially available and that long-term health effects require monitoring. The Associated Press report alone described the allergy test performed on Walker’s skin and the publication of the research in the CRISPR Journal.

Centre

41 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports agree that scientists used CRISPR to create two beagles, Alfie and Bailey, without the main allergy-causing protein. All 11 outlets led on the successful gene edit and the potential for hypoallergenic dogs. The Associated Press reports, carried in full by Click on Detroit and WKMG, provide the most detail.
  • Nine digests and two full reports name the company behind the work, Kindred Companion Sciences, and its founder, geneticist Matt Walker. The full reports quote Walker describing his relief and gratitude. Both also include a bioethicist’s warning that the technology could reduce adoptions of non-engineered shelter dogs.
  • The full reports specify the allergy test method: skin pricks with extracts from the beagles’ saliva and dander. They note the research was published in the CRISPR Journal. Neither the digests nor the full reports mention the cost of the procedure or a timeline for regulatory approval.

Right

7 rated outlets

We have not written our reading of the right coverage of this story. The right-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover CRISPR-edited beagles born without key allergy protein?
Of the 71 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 32% are rated left, 58% are rated centre, 10% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 84. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is CRISPR-edited beagles born without key allergy protein left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 71 rated outlets on this story, 32% are rated left, 58% are rated centre, 10% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of CRISPR-edited beagles born without key allergy protein biased?
CRISPR-edited beagles born without key allergy protein is one event reported by 84 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered CRISPR-edited beagles born without key allergy protein?
84 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What gene was edited in the beagles?
Scientists used CRISPR to switch off the gene responsible for producing the main allergy-causing protein in dogs. This protein is found in dog saliva, hair, and dander and triggers allergic reactions in humans. The edited beagles, Bailey and Alfie, tested negative for the protein.
How were the beagles tested for allergies?
An allergy test was conducted on Matt Walker, a geneticist with dog allergies. His skin was pricked with extracts from the beagles’ saliva and dander, as well as samples from a poodle and a goldendoodle. Walker reacted to the poodle and goldendoodle samples but showed no reaction to the beagles’ samples.
What are the ethical concerns about this technique?
Bioethicist Arthur Caplan said the technique could increase pet ownership but may discourage people from adopting shelter or rescue animals that are not genetically modified. The reports did not include responses from animal welfare organisations or further ethical debate.

Read it at the source

84 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

23
Show 15 more

Centre

41
Show 33 more

Right

7

Not rated

13
Show 5 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

CRISPR-edited beagles born without allergy protein | MediaBias News