Skip to the story
All stories

CRISPR-edited beagles lack main dog allergen, study finds

Scientists at Kindred Companion Sciences used gene editing to remove the protein that causes most dog allergies in humans

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
CRISPR-edited beagles lack main dog allergen, study finds

What this story says

  • Scientists at Kindred Companion Sciences used CRISPR to edit a gene in beagles, creating two puppies named Alfie and Bailey without the main allergy-causing protein in dogs.
  • The study, published in the CRISPR Journal, found the beagles' saliva and fur lacked the protein, and geneticist Matt Walker, who has severe dog allergies, experienced no reaction when exposed to them.
  • Bioethicist Arthur Caplan warned the technology could discourage adoption of shelter animals, while the long-term health effects of the genetic edit remain unclear.
  • The technique has not yet been tested on other dog breeds or commercialised, and further research is needed to confirm its safety and effectiveness.

Who covered it

Left 31%(22)Centre 59%(41)Right 10%(7)

Percentages are shares of the 70 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 11 of the 81 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

74/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

15/100

81 sources · methodology

Scientists at Kindred Companion Sciences, a New York-based biotech company, used CRISPR gene editing to produce two beagle puppies without the main protein that causes dog allergies in humans. The puppies, named Alfie and Bailey, were born in September 2024 after researchers edited the genetic code in dog skin cells to switch off the gene responsible for the allergy-causing protein. The edited genetic code was then transferred into eggs implanted in a beagle surrogate.

Tests on the puppies' saliva and fur showed no signs of the allergy-causing protein. Geneticist Matt Walker, who co-founded Kindred Companion Sciences and has severe dog allergies, tested the beagles on himself. He reported no allergic reaction when exposed to Alfie and Bailey, unlike his reactions to other dogs, including breeds marketed as hypoallergenic. The study was published in the CRISPR Journal on 4 September 2026.

Walker, who now lives with Bailey in New York, described the experience as "a mix of relief and awe and gratitude that it worked." He noted that the gene edited in the beagles is present in all dogs, and the company plans to test the technique on other breeds and service animals. However, experts not involved in the study cautioned that the long-term health effects of the genetic edit are unknown, and further testing is needed to confirm the technique's safety and effectiveness across a broader population.

What the coverage left out

None of the digests from left-rated outlets mentioned the ethical concerns raised by bioethicist Arthur Caplan about the potential impact on shelter adoptions. The right-rated digest also omitted this detail. The left-rated digests did not include the name of the CRISPR Journal, where the study was published, though they noted the use of CRISPR technology. The right-rated digest did not mention the journal or the need for long-term health monitoring of the puppies.

Coverage settled. We checked this 8 times and stopped on 11 Aug 2026, 01:15. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

22 rated outlets

  • The three left-rated digests carried the study’s publication in the CRISPR Journal and the names of the two beagles, Alfie and Bailey. They noted that the gene edit was performed using CRISPR, a Nobel Prize-winning technique, and that the edited puppies lacked the main allergy-causing protein in dogs. None of the digests mentioned the ethical concerns raised by bioethicist Arthur Caplan or the potential impact on shelter adoptions.

Centre

41 rated outlets

  • The six centre-rated digests all led on the creation of hypoallergenic beagles using CRISPR gene editing. They included the names of the puppies, the absence of the allergy-causing protein in their saliva and fur, and the involvement of Kindred Companion Sciences. The full report from My Mother Lode, a centre-rated outlet, provided additional detail: it quoted bioethicist Arthur Caplan warning that the technology could discourage adoption of shelter animals, and noted that the gene edit is rare but occurs naturally in some dogs.
  • The My Mother Lode report also included a direct quote from geneticist Matt Walker describing his personal experience with Bailey, and mentioned that the study was published in the CRISPR Journal. It carried the ethical concerns raised by Caplan and the need for further testing to confirm the technique’s safety and broader applicability.

Right

7 rated outlets

  • The five right-rated digests all reported that scientists used gene editing to create beagles without the main dog allergen. They led on the potential for hypoallergenic pets as a solution for people with allergies.
  • Breitbart, Sapo, El Financiero and The National Herald named the protein targeted by the editing. El Financiero added that widespread availability would take years. None of the digests mentioned the study’s limitations or ethical concerns.
  • The National Herald and Breitbart included the name of the lead researcher, Matt Walker, and described his personal experience with allergies. tippinsights incorrectly linked the beagle research to a separate Columbia University study on human embryos.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover CRISPR-edited beagles lack main dog allergen, study finds?
Of the 70 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 31% are rated left, 59% are rated centre, 10% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 81. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is CRISPR-edited beagles lack main dog allergen, study finds left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 70 rated outlets on this story, 31% are rated left, 59% are rated centre, 10% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of CRISPR-edited beagles lack main dog allergen, study finds biased?
CRISPR-edited beagles lack main dog allergen, study finds is one event reported by 81 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered CRISPR-edited beagles lack main dog allergen, study finds?
81 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the scientists edit in the beagles?
Scientists at Kindred Companion Sciences used CRISPR to edit a gene in beagles that produces the main allergy-causing protein in dogs. The edited puppies, Alfie and Bailey, lacked this protein in their saliva and fur, which was confirmed through testing.
Did the gene-edited beagles trigger allergies in people?
Geneticist Matt Walker, who has severe dog allergies, tested the beagles on himself and experienced no allergic reaction. The study found that the puppies' saliva and fur lacked the main allergy-causing protein, which is responsible for most human dog allergies.
What are the ethical concerns about the gene-edited beagles?
Bioethicist Arthur Caplan warned that the technology could discourage people from adopting shelter animals, as it may lead to a preference for engineered, hypoallergenic pets. The long-term health effects of the genetic edit are also unclear and require further monitoring.
Which outlets reported on the ethical concerns?
The full report from My Mother Lode, a centre-rated outlet, included the ethical concerns raised by bioethicist Arthur Caplan. None of the left-rated or right-rated digests mentioned these concerns.

Read it at the source

81 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

22
Show 14 more

Centre

41
Show 33 more

Right

7

Not rated

11
Show 3 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

CRISPR-edited beagles lack main dog allergen, study finds | MediaBias News