Underwear experiment reveals land use impacts soil health
Swiss citizen science project uses decomposition rates to measure biological activity.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Scientists Finally Figured Out Why Ancient Egyptian Art Still Looks So Vibrant
Photograph: Vice (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Nearly 1,000 volunteers in Switzerland buried over 2,000 pairs of organic cotton underwear at approximately 1,000 locations.
- The decomposition rate of the underwear after 30 and 60 days served as an indicator of soil biological activity.
- Private gardens showed the highest decomposition rates (58% after two months), followed by lawns (around 40%), with agricultural fields and meadows in between.
- Land use was identified as the most significant factor influencing decomposition rates, more so than measured soil properties.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 18 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 12 of the 30 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
61/100
Hype
41/100
30 sources · methodology
An experiment involving nearly 1,000 volunteers across Switzerland used buried organic cotton underwear to assess soil health. Participants buried over 2,000 pairs of underwear at around 1,000 locations. After 30 and 60 days, the underwear was exhumed, photographed, and sent to researchers along with soil samples. The rate at which the cotton decomposed was used as a measure of biological activity in the soil.
The findings, published in Plants People Planet, indicated that land use was the most critical factor affecting decomposition. Private gardens exhibited the highest decomposition rates, with 58% of the underwear breaking down within two months. Lawns showed lower activity, with approximately 40% decomposition. Agricultural fields and meadows fell between these two extremes. Researchers noted that this suggests how land is managed significantly influences soil life and quality.
Disagreement on the role of soil properties
While the reports agree that land use was the most significant factor influencing decomposition rates, there is a divergence regarding the influence of measured soil properties. The full report from Vice states that land use was identified as the most significant factor influencing decomposition rates, 'more so than measured soil properties.' However, the full report from Phys.org notes that 'Land use proved to be the most important factor influencing how quickly the underwear decomposed. Whether a site was used as a garden, meadow, cultivated field or lawn explained the differences better than most of the soil properties measured. Chemical soil characteristics, such as nutrient levels, also played a significant role.'
What the coverage left out
None of the left, centre, or right-rated reports printed below mention the specific soil properties that were measured, beyond general references to nutrient levels or organic matter. The full report from Vice states land use was more significant than 'measured soil properties,' but does not specify what those properties were. Similarly, the full report from Phys.org mentions that 'Chemical soil characteristics, such as nutrient levels, also played a significant role,' but does not detail which characteristics were measured.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 31 Aug 2026, 15:00, and will add the sides that appear.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
2 rated outlets
- The left-rated report from Vice led with the unusual nature of the experiment, describing it as 'the best way to test the quality and vitality of the soil' by having 'a bunch of people to bury their underwear in the dirt for two months.' It highlighted that private gardens had the 'liveliest soil' and that the 'underwear index' can be used to determine soil health. The report also noted that extremely rapid decomposition could indicate a nutrient overload and an unbalanced patch of dirt. It concluded by stating that if burying undies is what it takes to gauge soil health, 'let’s all grab a shovel and our least loved cotton underpants and get to digging in the name of science.'
Centre
10 rated outlets
- Centre-rated reports focused on the scientific findings and the methodology of the 'Proof by Underpants' project. They highlighted that land use is the key factor influencing soil health, with private gardens showing the most rapid decomposition and lawns the least. Several reports mentioned that the decomposition rate serves as an indicator of soil life and that healthy soil is crucial for fertility and ecosystem services. Some centre-rated outlets also noted that while rapid decomposition is beneficial for agriculture, it can indicate nutrient oversupply in near-natural habitats. The role of citizen science in enabling large-scale research was also a recurring theme.
Right
6 rated outlets
- Right-rated reports generally focused on the unusual aspect of the experiment and its findings regarding soil activity. Headlines often posed questions about why underwear was buried, such as in The Economic Times and Gulf News. Several reports mentioned that private gardens displayed the most rapid decomposition rates, indicating active microorganisms. Some digests, like EADaily, used more provocative phrasing such as 'Agrarian Stripping.' The core finding that the experiment aimed to raise awareness about soil ecosystems and generate data on biological activity was present across these reports.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Underwear experiment reveals land use impacts soil health?
- Of the 18 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 11% are rated left, 56% are rated centre, 33% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 30. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Underwear experiment reveals land use impacts soil health left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 18 rated outlets on this story, 11% are rated left, 56% are rated centre, 33% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Underwear experiment reveals land use impacts soil health biased?
- Underwear experiment reveals land use impacts soil health is one event reported by 30 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which outlets covered Underwear experiment reveals land use impacts soil health?
- 30 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- How did scientists measure soil health?
- Scientists used a citizen science project where nearly 1,000 volunteers buried over 2,000 pairs of organic cotton underwear across Switzerland. After 30 and 60 days, the underwear was dug up. The rate at which the cotton decomposed served as an indicator of the biological activity in the soil.
- What did the buried underwear reveal about soil health?
- The experiment revealed that land use is the most significant factor influencing soil biological activity. Private gardens showed the highest decomposition rates, indicating very active soil, while lawns had lower rates. Agricultural fields and meadows fell in between.
- Why was underwear used in the experiment?
- Organic cotton underwear was used because cotton is primarily cellulose, which soil organisms naturally break down. The faster the underwear decomposed, the more biologically active the soil was considered to be. This method was developed to raise public awareness about soil health.
Read it at the source
30 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
2Centre
10- Why did scientists ask 1,000 Swiss people to bury their underwear? What the buried 'underpants' could reveal about soil - The unusual science of measuring soil health (opens The Economic Times in a new tab)
The Economic Times — is The Economic Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Assessing soil health with underpants (opens Science in a new tab)
- Soil Scientists Buried 2,000 Pairs of Underwear to Prove a Point (opens Science Alert in a new tab)
Science Alert — is Science Alert biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Why scientists asked 1,000 people to bury their underwear (opens Science Daily in a new tab)
Science Daily — is Science Daily biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 2,000 Pairs of Buried Underwear Helped Measure Soil Health in This Unusual Experiment (opens Discover Magazine in a new tab)
Discover Magazine — is Discover Magazine biased? Our profile of this outlet
- This Is What Happens When 1,000 People Bury Their Underwear for Science (opens Nautilus in a new tab)
- Why did 1,000 Swiss citizens bury their underpants? (opens Ars Technica in a new tab)
Ars Technica — is Ars Technica biased? Our profile of this outlet
- What 2,000 Buried Underpants Revealed About Where Soil is Most Alive (opens studyfinds.com in a new tab)
studyfinds.com — is studyfinds.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
6- Did you know your underwear can tell you about soil health? Not kidding, Swiss scientists buried 2,000 pairs — here’s what they found (opens Malay Mail in a new tab)
Malay Mail — is Malay Mail biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Agranic Stripping: A Thousand People Buried Underpants in Switzerland: EADaily (opens EADaily in a new tab)
- Why were 2,000 pairs of underwear buried across Switzerland? What scientists found underground (opens Moneycontrol in a new tab)
Moneycontrol — is Moneycontrol biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Scientists asked 1,000 people to bury their underwear — what they found surprised them (opens Gulf News in a new tab)
- Why Do Swiss Scientists Ask Volunteers to Bury Their Underwear? (opens La Razón in a new tab)
- Researchers Came up with a Bizarre Request: They Dug up the Underwear of over a Thousand People (opens Origo in a new tab)
Not rated
12- Project Measures Soil Quality Using Buried Underwear (opens bluewin.ch in a new tab)
bluewin.ch — is bluewin.ch biased? Our profile of this outlet
- A Thousand People Buried Their Panties in the Ground. They Had a Good Reason. (opens Polsat News in a new tab)
Polsat News — is Polsat News biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Buried Underwear Shows Land Use Is Key to Soil Health (opens uzh.ch in a new tab)
- Project «Beweisstück Unterhose»: What Buried Underpants Reveal About Swiss Floors (opens 20 Minuten in a new tab)
20 Minuten — is 20 Minuten biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Buried the Panties. An Unusual Experiment Was Conducted in Switzerland to Study the Peculiarities of Different Types of Soil (opens Unknown in a new tab)
Unknown
- Scientists Ask 1,000 People to Bury Their Underwear. (opens omniletters.com in a new tab)
omniletters.com — is omniletters.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Why 2,000 pairs of underwear were buried in the ground—Swiss researchers' 'soil health map' — BigGo Finance (opens biggo.com in a new tab)
- For that Special Experiment, 1,000 Underwear Were Buried Underground, and After 2 Months of Digging, Scientists Got a Huge shock,... (opens TV9 Marathi in a new tab)
TV9 Marathi — is TV9 Marathi biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 4 more
- Why did 1,000 Swiss citizens bury their underpants? (opens technewstube.com in a new tab)
technewstube.com — is technewstube.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Burdened Underpants Show: Land Use Is Crucial for Soil Quality (opens Moneycab in a new tab)
- Research Project Measures Soil Quality with Buried Underpants (opens nachrichten.at in a new tab)
nachrichten.at — is nachrichten.at biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Buried Underwear Reveals Land Use Is Crucial for Soil Health (opens BIOENGINEER.ORG in a new tab)
BIOENGINEER.ORG — is BIOENGINEER.ORG biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
More in Science & Tech
All Science & Tech →Elsewhere on the site
Business & Economy•4 min readTrump announces US control of 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil
Climate•3 min readCoral reefs face irreversible decline due to frequent bleaching
Media•3 min readMet Museum Cancels John Galliano Exhibit After Backlash