Skip to the story
All stories

Fire at Zawiya oil depot in Libya destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline

Brega Petroleum Marketing Company declares emergency after second incident at the refinery in 48 hours

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Fire at Zawiya oil depot in Libya destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline

What this story says

  • The fire destroyed an estimated 4.5 million litres of gasoline at Libya’s Zawiya oil depot on 10 August 2026.
  • Brega Petroleum Marketing Company, which operates the depot, declared an emergency but did not confirm the cause of the fire.
  • The incident occurred two days after a drone strike caused a leak in an untreated naphtha tank at the same refinery.
  • No casualties were reported, but the fire raised concerns about fuel supply disruptions in Libya’s divided political landscape.

Who covered it

Left 38%(24)Centre 32%(20)Right 30%(19)

Percentages are shares of the 63 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 28 of the 91 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

74/100

Craft

85/100

Hype

15/100

91 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 24 of the 63 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

A fire broke out on 10 August 2026 at diesel tank No. 402 at the Zawiya oil depot in Libya, destroying an estimated 4.5 million litres of gasoline. The blaze, accompanied by thick black smoke, was reported by Brega Petroleum Marketing Company, which manages the facility. The company stated the cause of the fire was unknown and declared an extreme state of emergency in the area.

The Zawiya refinery, located 40 kilometres west of Tripoli, is Libya’s largest operational refinery, with a capacity of 120,000 barrels per day. Firefighting teams worked to contain the blaze and cool adjacent tanks to prevent further spread. Brega Petroleum Marketing Company, owned by the state-run National Oil Corporation (NOC), said the refinery continued to operate without suspension, according to two engineers at the site.

The incident followed a drone strike on 8 August 2026, which caused a leak in an untreated naphtha tank at the same refinery. Staff managed to control the leak, but the subsequent fire at tank No. 402 raised concerns about repeated attacks on Libya’s energy infrastructure. Brega Petroleum Marketing Company called for an immediate investigation and urged all parties to avoid targeting oil facilities, warning of risks to residents and fuel supplies.

Disagreements in the reports

The reports disagree on whether the fire was caused by a direct strike. WTVB reported that the National Oil Corporation stated the tank was “directly targeted,” while Anadolu Ajansı quoted Brega Petroleum Marketing Company as saying the tank was “hit under circumstances whose causes remain unknown.” Neither outlet provided evidence to confirm the cause.

What the coverage left out

No left-rated outlet ran this story. None of the digests or reports mentioned the estimated financial cost of the damage or the potential impact on Libya’s fuel supply chain beyond general warnings. Anadolu Ajansı’s report was the only one to note that Brega Petroleum Marketing Company provided no information about casualties.

Coverage settled. We checked this 14 times and stopped on 16 Aug 2026, 14:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

24 rated outlets

  • Left-rated outlets led on the fire at Zawiya oil depot being caused by a drone attack. All 12 digests and the Xinhua report state the tank was targeted, with 10 specifying a drone. The volume of gasoline destroyed, 4.5 million litres, appears in eight digests and the Xinhua report.
  • The National Oil Corporation’s warning that it may halt operations if attacks continue is carried in three digests. The Xinhua report quotes the NOC statement directly, naming the tank as 402-T and the subsidiary Brega Petroleum Marketing Company. No casualties are reported in any of the 12 accounts.
  • None of the digests mention the cost of the lost gasoline or the refinery’s daily processing capacity. The Xinhua report does not name any group responsible for the attack, nor does it quote local residents or officials beyond the NOC statement.

Centre

20 rated outlets

  • The two centre-rated reports, WTVB and the Jerusalem Post digest, both led on the fire at diesel tank No. 402 and the emergency response. WTVB’s full report included details of the refinery’s capacity, the estimated volume of gasoline in the tank, and the earlier drone strike on 8 August. It also quoted the National Oil Corporation’s statement that the tank was “directly targeted” and included unverified footage of the blaze.
  • WTVB named the engineers who confirmed the refinery remained operational and provided context on Libya’s political divisions, including the rival governments in Tripoli and Benghazi. The Jerusalem Post digest mentioned only the earlier drone strike and the leak it caused.

Right

19 rated outlets

  • The three right-rated digests, Anadolu Ajansı, Al Bawaba, and The Straits Times, all reported the fire at tank No. 402 and the unknown cause. Anadolu Ajansı’s full report led on the emergency response and the company’s warning about the risks of targeting oil facilities. It quoted Brega Petroleum Marketing Company’s statement that the tank was “hit under circumstances whose causes remain unknown” and included a broader context on Libya’s political divisions and the strategic importance of Zawiya.
  • Anadolu Ajansı also reported the company’s appeal to all parties to halt hostilities near oil facilities, framing the incident as part of ongoing security tensions in the region. Al Bawaba’s digest focused on the earlier drone strike on 8 August, while The Straits Times digest repeated the basic facts of the fire and the unknown cause.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Fire at Zawiya oil depot in Libya destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline?
Of the 63 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 38% are rated left, 32% are rated centre, 30% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 91. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Fire at Zawiya oil depot in Libya destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 63 rated outlets on this story, 38% are rated left, 32% are rated centre, 30% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Fire at Zawiya oil depot in Libya destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline biased?
Fire at Zawiya oil depot in Libya destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline is one event reported by 91 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Fire at Zawiya oil depot in Libya destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Fire at Zawiya oil depot in Libya destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline?
91 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
How much gasoline was destroyed in the fire at Zawiya oil depot?
The fire at diesel tank No. 402 destroyed an estimated 4.5 million litres of gasoline, according to Brega Petroleum Marketing Company. The refinery, Libya’s largest operational facility, has a capacity of 120,000 barrels per day.
What caused the fire at Libya’s Zawiya oil depot?
The cause of the fire remains unknown. Brega Petroleum Marketing Company stated the tank was “hit under circumstances whose causes remain unknown,” while the National Oil Corporation said it was “directly targeted.” No evidence confirming either claim was provided.
Did the fire at Zawiya oil depot cause any casualties?
Brega Petroleum Marketing Company did not provide information about casualties, according to Anadolu Ajansı. None of the reports mentioned injuries or deaths resulting from the fire.
How did the fire at Zawiya oil depot affect Libya’s fuel supply?
The refinery continued to operate without suspension, according to two engineers at the site. However, Brega Petroleum Marketing Company warned that targeting oil facilities could disrupt fuel supplies and pose risks to residents and workers.

Read it at the source

91 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

24
Show 16 more

Centre

20
Show 12 more

Right

19
Show 11 more

Not rated

28
Show 20 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Zawiya oil depot fire destroys 4.5m litres of gasoline | MediaBias News