Skip to the story
All stories

US military disables ad trackers on government devices

Action taken amid concerns that location data could be used to track American personnel.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
FILE PHOTO: Ranking Member U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) speaks at a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 22, 2026. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon/File Photo

What this story says

  • The US military has disabled advertising identifiers (MAIDs) on government phones and computers.
  • This action was prompted by concerns that foreign adversaries could use commercially available location data to track or target American personnel.
  • Senator Ron Wyden's letters disclosed these changes.
  • Reuters reported that ad trackers may have revealed US troop positions to Iran.

Who covered it

Left 23%(5)Centre 36%(8)Right 41%(9)

Percentages are shares of the 22 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 20 of the 42 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

41/100

42 sources · methodology

The US military has disabled advertising identifiers on government phones and computers. This action was taken due to concerns that foreign adversaries could use commercially available location data to track or target American personnel. The changes were disclosed in letters sent by U.S. Senator Ron Wyden.

Disagreement on timing

The US Air Force stated it disabled these identifiers two months ago, according to Live Mint. US Special Operations Command disabled them more recently, according to the same report.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mention the specific timing of the disabling of identifiers by the US Air Force or US Special Operations Command. None of the centre-rated digests mention the specific timing of the disabling of identifiers by the US Air Force or US Special Operations Command. None of the right-rated digests mention the specific timing of the disabling of identifiers by the US Air Force or US Special Operations Command.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 4 Sept 2026, 20:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

US military disables ad trackers on government devices
The HinduLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

5 rated outlets

  • The Independent and The Independent (US) digests both led on the disabling of ad trackers by the US military. Both digests stated that this action followed reports that commercially available location data had been used to target American forces in the Middle East. The digests did not mention Senator Ron Wyden or specific branches of the military.

Centre

8 rated outlets

  • TechCrunch and Live Mint digests both reported that a senator's letter confirmed the US military's move to disable ad tracking. TechCrunch stated this was after foreign adversaries used location data to target troops. Live Mint reported that the US Air Force disabled the identifiers two months ago, while US Special Operations Command did so more recently.

Right

9 rated outlets

  • News-pravda.com, The Dallas Express News, wbap.com, Protothema, and Iefimerida digests all reported that the US military disabled advertising identifiers on government devices. News-pravda.com framed the story with the headline 'Death through advertising. will shutting down help?'. The Dallas Express News and wbap.com highlighted that this action followed location-data warnings. Protothema and Iefimerida mentioned fears of targeting soldiers in the Middle East. Several of these digests noted that the action was taken due to concerns about foreign adversaries using location data to track or target American personnel. The Dallas Express News and wbap.com mentioned that these changes were disclosed in military letters released by U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover US military disables ad trackers on government devices?
Of the 22 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 23% are rated left, 36% are rated centre, 41% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 42. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is US military disables ad trackers on government devices left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 22 rated outlets on this story, 23% are rated left, 36% are rated centre, 41% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of US military disables ad trackers on government devices biased?
US military disables ad trackers on government devices is one event reported by 42 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered US military disables ad trackers on government devices?
42 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why did the US military disable ad trackers?
The US military disabled advertising identifiers on government phones and computers due to concerns that foreign adversaries could use commercially available location data to track or target American personnel. This action was disclosed in letters from U.S. Senator Ron Wyden.
What is the risk associated with ad trackers?
Commercially available location data collected through advertising trackers could potentially be used by foreign adversaries to identify and target US military personnel. Reuters reported that ad trackers may have revealed US troop positions to Iran.
Which branches of the US military are involved?
The US Air Force stated it disabled these identifiers two months ago. US Special Operations Command disabled them more recently. Other branches and commands have also taken this action.

Read it at the source

42 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

5

Centre

8

Right

9
Show 1 more

Not rated

20
Show 12 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

US Military Disables Ad Trackers | MediaBias News