Alaska Senate race probed for voter confusion scheme

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Alaska Senate race probed for voter confusion scheme?

Of the 19 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 42% are rated left, 53% are rated centre, 5% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is Alaska Senate race probed for voter confusion scheme left or right?

Neither side dominates it. Of the 19 rated outlets on this story, 42% are rated left, 53% are rated centre, 5% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.

Is the coverage of Alaska Senate race probed for voter confusion scheme biased?

Alaska Senate race probed for voter confusion scheme is one event reported by 19 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting Alaska Senate race probed for voter confusion scheme?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered Alaska Senate race probed for voter confusion scheme?

19 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What is the criminal investigation in Alaska about?

A criminal investigation is examining an alleged scheme to confuse voters in the Alaska U.S. Senate race. The scheme reportedly involved placing a candidate named Dan J. Sullivan on the ballot alongside incumbent Republican Senator Daniel Sullivan.

Who confirmed the investigation?

U.S. Attorney Michael Heyman confirmed the existence of the criminal investigation. He stated that the probe has been ongoing for months and has recently accelerated due to new information.

What is the Department of Justice doing?

The Department of Justice is pursuing a civil lawsuit to block the rapid certification of the Alaska Senate election results. They cite potential voter confusion caused by having two candidates with the same name on the ballot.

Have the candidates commented on the allegations?

Yes, Democratic candidate Mary Peltola has denied any knowledge of the scheme to place a candidate with the same name on the ballot. Dan J. Sullivan Jr. has also denied having any contact with Peltola's campaign.