Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics87 outlets ran this4 min read

Andy Burnham exchanged messages with impersonator of Trump aide Susie Wiles

The UK prime minister communicated with someone posing as White House chief of staff before becoming suspicious

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Leader of the Labour Party Andy Burnham makes a social media post after a visit to The Passage Homeless Charity, July 20, 2026, in the Victoria area of London, England. Christopher Furlong/Getty

What this story says

  • Andy Burnham, the UK prime minister, exchanged messages with someone impersonating White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, as reported by Politico and confirmed by the BBC.
  • The messages were described as insignificant, and Burnham became suspicious during the exchange, according to anonymous officials cited by Politico.
  • The incident follows an earlier FBI investigation into a hack of Wiles’ phone, raising concerns about a possible repeat breach.
  • The UK Embassy in Washington raised the matter with the White House, though neither government has publicly commented on the security implications.

Who covered it

Left 39%(24)Centre 21%(13)Right 40%(25)

Percentages are shares of the 62 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 25 of the 87 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

78/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

15/100

87 sources · methodology

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham exchanged messages with an individual posing as Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff and a close adviser to US President Donald Trump. The exchange was first reported by Politico, which cited four anonymous officials, and later confirmed by the BBC. The messages were described as brief and of no significance, according to Politico’s sources. Burnham grew suspicious during the conversation and did not continue the exchange.

The incident follows a previous FBI investigation into a hack of Wiles’ personal phone in May 2026, during which unknown individuals accessed her contacts and impersonated her to reach other officials. Politico reported that the exchange with Burnham raised concerns within the British government that Wiles’ phone may have been compromised again. The UK Embassy in Washington subsequently raised the matter with the White House, as confirmed by two officials.

Neither Downing Street nor the White House has publicly commented on the incident. A spokesperson for Burnham told Politico that the prime minister’s office would not discuss national security matters. The timing and content of the messages between Burnham and the impersonator remain undisclosed.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mentioned the UK Embassy’s contact with the White House, though this was reported by Politico and confirmed by CBS News. The centre-rated digests omitted the earlier FBI investigation into Wiles’ phone hack, though CBS News included it in its full report. The right-rated digests did not report the embassy’s contact with the White House.

Tags:#UKPolitics#WhiteHouseSecurity#CyberSecurity#AndyBurnham#SusieWiles#DiplomaticIncident

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 17 Aug 2026, 13:15, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Andy Burnham Fotó: TOBY SHEPHEARD/AFP
444.huLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

24 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports led on the security implications of the incident. Meduza and Cumhuriyet described the exchange as a "scandal at the top of the government," while Raw Story framed it as reigniting "White House hacking fears." The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age noted that the timing and content of the messages remained unknown, echoing Politico’s reporting.
  • 444.hu’s full report highlighted that Burnham did not verify the authenticity of the contact before engaging, a detail absent from most digests. None of the left-rated digests mentioned the UK Embassy’s contact with the White House, though this was reported by Politico and confirmed by CBS News.

Centre

13 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports focused on the factual sequence of events. CBS News, the only full report in this group, led with the confirmation from the BBC and Politico, noting that Burnham exchanged "a few messages" before becoming suspicious. Bloomberg and Digi 24’s digests similarly emphasised the exchange itself, without additional commentary.
  • The BBC’s digest stated that Downing Street declined to comment on the security breach, a detail repeated by bucksfreepress.co.uk and The Echo UK. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the earlier FBI investigation into Wiles’ phone hack, though CBS News included it in its full report.

Right

25 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports framed the incident as Burnham being "duped" or "fooled." Bild and El Debate’s digests used the word "impostor" to describe the individual, while El Mundo’s digest noted that Burnham had "fallen into an old trap." Focus.de described Burnham as having "communicated news" with the impersonator before becoming suspicious.
  • None of the right-rated digests mentioned the UK Embassy’s contact with the White House, though this was reported by Politico and confirmed by CBS News. Berliner Morgenpost’s digest noted that this was not the first incident of its kind, a detail absent from other right-rated reports.

Read it at the source

87 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

24
Show 16 more

Centre

13
Show 5 more

Right

25
Show 17 more

Not rated

25
Show 17 more

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Andy Burnham exchanged messages with impersonator of Trump aide Susie…?
Of the 62 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 39% are rated left, 21% are rated centre, 40% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 87. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Andy Burnham exchanged messages with impersonator of Trump aide Susie… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 62 rated outlets on this story, 39% are rated left, 21% are rated centre, 40% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Andy Burnham exchanged messages with impersonator of Trump aide Susie… biased?
Andy Burnham exchanged messages with impersonator of Trump aide Susie Wiles is one event reported by 87 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Andy Burnham exchanged messages with impersonator of Trump aide Susie…?
87 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did Andy Burnham discuss with the impersonator?
The content of the messages between Andy Burnham and the individual impersonating Susie Wiles has not been disclosed. Politico reported that the messages were described as insignificant by anonymous officials, and Burnham became suspicious during the exchange.
Why did the UK Embassy contact the White House about the incident?
The UK Embassy in Washington raised the incident with the White House after Burnham exchanged messages with the impersonator, according to two officials cited by Politico. The concern was that Susie Wiles’ phone may have been hacked again, following a previous FBI investigation into a similar breach.
Has the White House commented on the incident?
Neither the White House nor Downing Street has publicly commented on the incident. A spokesperson for Burnham told Politico that the prime minister’s office would not discuss national security matters, and the White House has not responded to requests for comment.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
Premierul israelian Benjamin Netanyahu. Foto: Profimedia Images5 min readNetanyahu labels UK an 'Islamic republic' with nuclear weapons in radio interviewRead storyWhite House lets private cyber firms attack foreign criminal networks under supervision6 min readWhite House lets private cyber firms attack foreign criminal networks under supervisionRead storyAndy Baker to leave White House national security post after 18 months5 min readAndy Baker to leave White House national security post after 18 monthsRead story

Elsewhere on the site

IPSO Regulated imageMedia•5 min readJason Arday death: Former Cambridge professor found unresponsive in London
Andy Burnham messaged fake Trump aide account | MediaBias News