Skip to the story
All stories

BRICS Leaders Urge Restraint in Middle East, Condemn Unilateral Sanctions

The bloc's joint declaration calls for de-escalation and adherence to international law amid regional tensions.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Samit BRIKS-a: Zabrinutost zbog rastućih tenzija na Bliskom istoku i osuda uvođenja sankcija bez odobrenja UN 1

What this story says

  • BRICS leaders expressed deep concern over escalating tensions in the Middle East.
  • The bloc condemned unilateral sanctions not authorized by the UN, calling them a violation of international law.
  • BRICS leaders urged maximum restraint in the Middle East conflict.
  • The joint declaration was adopted unanimously at the summit in New Delhi.

Who covered it

Left 32%(40)Centre 30%(37)Right 38%(47)

Percentages are shares of the 124 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 180 of the 304 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

41/100

304 sources · methodology

Leaders of the BRICS nations met in New Delhi and adopted a joint declaration expressing deep concern over escalating tensions in the Middle East. The leaders called for maximum restraint in the region and condemned unilateral sanctions that are not authorized by the United Nations, stating they violate international law and the UN Charter.

Disagreement on specific wording

While the joint declaration from the BRICS summit called for maximum restraint in the Middle East, the specific phrasing used to describe this call varied across reports. Dnevni list Danas reported the statement called for "maximum restraint," while Devdiscourse and El Confidencial noted the declaration emphasized "peaceful resolution through dialogue and diplomacy" and "maximum restraint" respectively. Some reports, such as from Arab News and Islamabad Post, stated the leaders called for "calm" in the Middle East.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention the specific concern raised by Dnevni list Danas regarding "deliberate attacks" on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities under IAEA supervision, nor its interpretation as an indirect criticism of US and Israeli actions. The right-rated digests also do not mention the Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian's attendance at the summit, which was noted in the full report from Dnevni list Danas.

Coverage settled. We checked this 9 times and stopped on 18 Sept 2026, 01:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

40 rated outlets

  • Left-rated outlets reported that BRICS leaders met in New Delhi and issued a joint declaration calling for "maximum restraint" in the Middle East. The reports agreed that the leaders expressed "deep concern" over escalating tensions in the region.
  • Dnevni list Danas, which published a full report, stated that the leaders condemned sanctions not approved by the UN. This outlet also reported that the BRICS statement called for nuclear security to be protected during armed conflicts, interpreting this as indirect criticism of US and Israeli actions.
  • Several digests noted that Iran and the UAE participated in the summit. Haaretz mentioned that Iranian President Pezeshkian met with the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi on the summit's sidelines.

Centre

37 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports consistently highlighted the BRICS nations' united stand for peace amid Middle East tensions and their call for maximum restraint. Devdiscourse and Ottumwa Courier noted the 'New Delhi Declaration' emphasized peaceful dispute resolution and criticized unilateral trade measures. El Confidencial and La Libre reported that BRICS countries agreed to maximum restraint and rejected unilateral sanctions. Bloomberg mentioned BRICS nations expressed "deep concern" and called for "maximum restraint." Hola News and El Comercio also reported on the unanimous adoption of the New Delhi Declaration, focusing on the bloc's positions on global issues and cooperation.

Right

47 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports primarily focused on the BRICS summit participants opposing unilateral sanctions that contradict international law and urging restraint in the Middle East conflict. Jyllands-Posten and berlingske.dk reported that BRICS countries called for restraint. news-pravda.com and Interfax.ru highlighted the opposition to unilateral sanctions contrary to international law, with Interfax.ru specifically mentioning the condemnation of both unilateral economic and secondary sanctions. Arab News and Tribune India reported the call for "maximum restraint" and expressed "deep concern" over escalating tensions. 연합뉴스-Yonhap News Agency and BT also noted the call for restraint and opposition to sanctions violating international law.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover BRICS Leaders Urge Restraint in Middle East, Condemn Unilateral…?
Of the 124 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 32% are rated left, 30% are rated centre, 38% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 304. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is BRICS Leaders Urge Restraint in Middle East, Condemn Unilateral… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 124 rated outlets on this story, 32% are rated left, 30% are rated centre, 38% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of BRICS Leaders Urge Restraint in Middle East, Condemn Unilateral… biased?
BRICS Leaders Urge Restraint in Middle East, Condemn Unilateral Sanctions is one event reported by 304 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered BRICS Leaders Urge Restraint in Middle East, Condemn Unilateral…?
304 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did BRICS leaders express concern about?
BRICS leaders expressed deep concern over escalating tensions in the Middle East. They also voiced concern over "deliberate attacks" on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities under IAEA supervision, as reported by Dnevni list Danas.
What was BRICS' stance on sanctions?
BRICS leaders condemned unilateral sanctions that are not authorized by the UN, stating they violate international law and the UN Charter. They called for the lifting of such measures.
What action did BRICS call for in the Middle East?
BRICS leaders urged "maximum restraint" in the Middle East conflict. They also advocated for peaceful dispute resolution through dialogue and diplomacy, according to some reports.

Read it at the source

321 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

41
Show 33 more

Centre

40
Show 32 more

Right

56
Show 48 more

Not rated

184
Show 176 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

BRICS Leaders on Middle East | MediaBias News