Skip to the story
All stories

EU plans ban on social media for under-13s

Ursula von der Leyen announced proposals for the 'EU Kids Act' during her State of the Union address.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
La presidente de la Comisi�n Europea, Ursula von der Leyen, habla durante el debate del Estado del Uni�n en el Parlamento Europeo.EFE

What this story says

  • The European Commission plans to propose a ban on social media for children under 13 years of age.
  • Children aged 13 to 15 will have restricted access, possibly through 'mini-accounts' supervised by parents.
  • European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the proposals during her State of the Union address.
  • The proposed legislation will be called the 'EU Kids Act'.

Who covered it

Left 22%(2)Centre 0%(0)Right 78%(7)

Percentages are shares of the 9 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 26 of the 35 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

41/100

35 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 2 of the 9 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The European Commission intends to propose a ban on social media for children under 13 years of age. For those between 13 and 15, access will be restricted, potentially through 'mini-accounts' that require parental supervision. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced these proposals during her State of the Union address. The legislation is to be known as the 'EU Kids Act'.

Coverage

Omissions

None of the centre-rated reports covered this story. None of the left-rated digests mentioned the specific case of Olà, a 14-year-old Belgian girl who died by suicide, which was cited by El Mundo as a reason for the proposed legislation.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 16 Sept 2026, 09:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

2 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports led on the proposed ban for children under 13. Both reports mentioned Ursula von der Leyen's announcement during the State of the Union address. They also noted the plan for restricted access for 13 to 15-year-olds. One report quoted von der Leyen saying, 'We do not have to accept that children are drawn into increasingly extreme content'.

Centre

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated centre has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Right

7 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports focused on the proposed ban for children under 13 and restricted access for those up to 15. Seven reports mentioned Ursula von der Leyen's announcement during the State of the Union address. One report stated that the EU wants to ban social networks for children under 13 years of age and limit them to 15 years of age. Another report included a quote from von der Leyen: 'No social networks under the age of 13'.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover EU plans ban on social media for under-13s?
Of the 9 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 22% are rated left, 0% are rated centre, 78% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 35. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is EU plans ban on social media for under-13s left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 9 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of EU plans ban on social media for under-13s biased?
EU plans ban on social media for under-13s is one event reported by 35 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting EU plans ban on social media for under-13s?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered EU plans ban on social media for under-13s?
35 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the EU proposing regarding social media for children?
The European Commission plans to propose a ban on social media for children under 13. Those aged 13 to 15 would have restricted access, potentially through 'mini-accounts' supervised by parents. The legislation is to be known as the 'EU Kids Act'.
Who announced these proposals?
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced these proposals during her State of the Union address. She stated that the EU must act to protect children from the risks associated with social media.
What is the 'EU Kids Act'?
The 'EU Kids Act' is the proposed name for the new legislation aimed at restricting children's access to social media. It will establish age limits and specific access rules for different age groups.

Read it at the source

35 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

2

Centre

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Right

7

Not rated

26
Show 18 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

EU Kids Act proposed | MediaBias News