Hipertextual media bias and reliability
Hipertextual is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 7 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Hipertextual biased?
Hipertextual is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Hipertextual left or right?
Hipertextual is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Hipertextual reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Hipertextual. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Hipertextual has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Hipertextual’s own report linked underneath.
Apple is enhancing privacy safeguards on macOS, specifically for 'Full Disk Access,' due to concerns about how AI agents are using this permission. The company plans to introduce more explicit user actions required to grant such broad access.
Hipertextual reported it asApple Hardens macOS Security so AI Doesn't Access Your Information (opens Hipertextual in a new tab)
Paramount has settled lawsuits brought by state attorneys general and the Writers Guild of America concerning its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The settlements pave the way for the $81 billion deal to proceed, pending final court approval.
Hipertextual reported it asParamount Overcomes a Key Obstacle and Is Moving Towards Closing Warner Bros. Purchase (opens Hipertextual in a new tab)
Cybersecurity researchers used Anthropic's Claude AI to access OpenAI's internal systems by exploiting a vulnerability in the company's community forum. The team gained access to an employee's ChatGPT account, which was linked to the code repository, and reported the findings to OpenAI, receiving a $6,500 reward.
Hipertextual reported it asClaude Helped Hack Into ChatGPT Accounts of OpenAI Employees (opens Hipertextual in a new tab)
The European Commission plans to propose a ban on social media for children under 13. Those aged 13 to 15 would have restricted access, potentially via parent-supervised 'mini-accounts'. The legislation is to be known as the 'EU Kids Act'.
Hipertextual reported it asThe European Union Wants to Ban Social Networks for Minors, multiplayer... and Also AI Chatbots (opens Hipertextual in a new tab)
Apple has launched its first foldable smartphone, the iPhone Duo, at its 'Surprise and Shine' event. The company also introduced the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. This marks the first major product launch under new CEO John Ternus.
Hipertextual reported it asThe Folding iPhone Will Not Be “Ultra”, After All: This Is the Name Apple Has Chosen (opens Hipertextual in a new tab)
Apple CEO John Ternus posted a cryptic video ahead of the company's expected iPhone 18 Pro unveiling. The video appears to hint at a new variable aperture camera feature for the device, which is set to be announced alongside new Apple Watch models.
Hipertextual reported it asThe Folding iPhone Will Not Be “Ultra”, After All: This Is the Name Apple Has Chosen (opens Hipertextual in a new tab)
OpenAI has announced that an internal AI model has produced a solution to the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem, one of mathematics' seven Millennium Prize Problems. The company claims approximately 10,000 AI agents worked on the problem for 88 hours. However, mathematicians have expressed skepticism due to the lack of a publicly disclosed proof.
Hipertextual reported it asOpenAI Says Its AI Solved the Mathematical Riddle of the Millennium, but a Scientist Accuses It of Plagiarism (opens Hipertextual in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Hipertextual. We asked on 9 October 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Hipertextual.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- hipertextual.com
- Seen publishing on
- hipertextual.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 7
- Reports listed
- 7
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 8 September 2026
7 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Hipertextual has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 7 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Hipertextual: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 25 October 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 8 October 2026. Ratings pulled 9 October 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Hipertextual publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.