Researchers Hack OpenAI Using Anthropic AI Model

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Researchers Hack OpenAI Using Anthropic AI Model?

Of the 45 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 18% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 42% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 124. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is Researchers Hack OpenAI Using Anthropic AI Model left or right?

Neither side dominates it. Of the 45 rated outlets on this story, 18% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 42% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.

Is the coverage of Researchers Hack OpenAI Using Anthropic AI Model biased?

Researchers Hack OpenAI Using Anthropic AI Model is one event reported by 124 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which outlets covered Researchers Hack OpenAI Using Anthropic AI Model?

124 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

How did researchers gain access to OpenAI's systems?

Researchers from Hacktron AI exploited a vulnerability in OpenAI's community forum, specifically related to image processing. This allowed them to access an OpenAI employee's ChatGPT account, which was linked to the company's code repository, thereby gaining access to internal systems.

Which AI model was used in the hack?

The researchers used Anthropic's Claude AI model, specifically Claude Opus 5, to carry out the breach. Initial attempts with an earlier version, Claude Opus 4.8, were unsuccessful.

What was the outcome for the researchers?

OpenAI acknowledged the security flaws discovered by the Hacktron AI team and rewarded them with $6,500 as part of their bug bounty program. The company stated it has since patched the vulnerabilities.