Skip to the story
All stories

GAO says Trump cannot withhold $800 million in congressionally approved spending

Watchdog agency states administration's plan violates Impoundment Control Act

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
GAO says Trump cannot withhold $800 million in congressionally approved spending

What this story says

  • President Donald Trump cannot withhold more than $800 million in congressionally approved spending beyond the fiscal year's end, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
  • The GAO stated that the Trump administration's plan to unilaterally rescind funds violates the Impoundment Control Act.
  • The agency's general counsel wrote that any withholding of appropriated funds beyond their expiration date subverts Congress's constitutional power of the purse.
  • The Trump administration announced its intention to impound more than $800 million from 11 appropriations accounts.

Who covered it

Left 60%(31)Centre 36%(19)Right 4%(2)

Percentages are shares of the 52 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 54 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

70/100

Craft

75/100

Hype

15/100

54 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 2 of the 52 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has determined that President Donald Trump is not permitted to withhold more than $800 million in spending approved by Congress beyond the end of the fiscal year. The watchdog agency's general counsel stated that the administration's plan to unilaterally rescind these funds violates the Impoundment Control Act. This act was passed to codify Congress's power over government spending. The GAO's determination was sent to federal lawmakers and Vice President JD Vance. The Trump administration had announced its intention to impound more than $800 million from 11 appropriations accounts, targeting funds for immigrant services and diversity-focused initiatives.

According to the GAO, federal law requires that funds proposed for rescission must be made available unless Congress completes action on a bill that aligns with the president's request. The administration can withhold funds for 45 days while Congress considers the issue. If Congress has not acted within this period, the president must release the funds. The GAO noted that the Trump administration announced these cuts with only five days remaining in the federal fiscal year and with the House out of session, making congressional action difficult. The GAO described this maneuver, known as a 'pocket rescission,' as illegal.

Disagreement on GAO's impartiality and legal basis

Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), stated that the GAO has become hyper-partisan and that Congress had attempted to cut its spending. Mark Paoletta, general counsel for OMB, said the administration is using the system established by Congress. The Washington Sun reported these statements.

What the coverage left out

None of the left or centre-rated reports mention the U.S. Supreme Court's previous decision regarding a similar pocket rescission of foreign aid funds from a year prior, which the court declined to block. The reports also do not include specific details about the 11 appropriations accounts targeted for cuts, beyond general categories like immigrant services and diversity initiatives.

Coverage settled. We checked this 66 times and stopped on 5 Oct 2026, 13:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Sen. Susan Collins at the Capitol.
washingtonsun.comLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

31 rated outlets

  • The Washington Sun reported that the Government Accountability Office stated the Trump administration’s plan to withhold $800 million in congressionally approved spending violates the Impoundment Control Act. The Sun noted this is the second year the administration has used this method, calling it a “pocket rescission.”
  • The Sun quoted Edda Emmanuelli Perez, the GAO’s general counsel, who wrote that the action subverts Congress’s constitutional power of the purse. The report also included comments from Russell Vought, the OMB director, who called the GAO “hyper partisan.”
  • Digests from 11 other left-rated outlets reported that President Trump is not permitted to withhold more than $800 million in congressionally approved spending beyond the fiscal year’s end, according to the GAO. Seven of these digests specified the amount as $810 million.

Centre

19 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports led with the GAO's conclusion that President Trump cannot withhold more than $800 million in spending approved by Congress. Washington Top News and Winnipeg Free Press reported that the GAO's review was sent to federal lawmakers and Vice President JD Vance. Washington Top News also noted that the administration's plan targets funds for immigrant services and diversity-focused initiatives. The reports mentioned that the maneuver is known as a 'pocket rescission' and that the GAO considers it illegal. Washington Top News included comments from Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who expects courts to have the final word on the issue, and Rep. Brendan Boyle, who called the GAO's decision clear and the pocket rescission illegal.

Right

2 rated outlets

We have not written our reading of the right coverage of this story. The right-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover GAO says Trump cannot withhold $800 million in congressionally approved…?
Of the 52 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 60% are rated left, 36% are rated centre, 4% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 54. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is GAO says Trump cannot withhold $800 million in congressionally approved… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 52 rated outlets on this story, 60% are rated left, 36% are rated centre, 4% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of GAO says Trump cannot withhold $800 million in congressionally approved… biased?
GAO says Trump cannot withhold $800 million in congressionally approved spending is one event reported by 54 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting GAO says Trump cannot withhold $800 million in congressionally approved…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered GAO says Trump cannot withhold $800 million in congressionally approved…?
54 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the GAO's finding on President Trump's spending plan?
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has determined that President Donald Trump is not permitted to withhold more than $800 million in spending approved by Congress beyond the end of the fiscal year. The agency stated that the administration's plan violates the Impoundment Control Act.
Why does the GAO consider the administration's plan illegal?
The GAO's general counsel wrote that any withholding of appropriated funds beyond their expiration date subverts both the constitutional process for enacting federal law and Congress's constitutional power of the purse. The agency described the maneuver, known as a 'pocket rescission,' as illegal.
How much money is the Trump administration attempting to impound?
The Trump administration announced its intention to impound more than $800 million from 11 appropriations accounts. The GAO's determination concerns the legality of withholding these funds beyond the end of the fiscal year.

Read it at the source

55 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

31
Show 23 more

Centre

19
Show 11 more

Right

3

Not rated

2

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Trump and $800 million spending | MediaBias News