Federal News Network media bias and reliability
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Federal News Network in the centre. We have seen it on 10 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Federal News Network biased?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Federal News Network in the centre. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Federal News Network left or right?
Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check place Federal News Network in the centre. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Centre.
Is Federal News Network reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Federal News Network are Media Bias/Fact Check: High factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Federal News Network has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Federal News Network’s own report linked underneath.
A Government Accountability Office report found the Trump administration spent $9.5 billion on paid administrative leave for federal workers in 2025. The initiative, known as DOGE, led to a 435% increase in such leave, with an estimated $6.7 billion spent on a deferred resignation program.
Federal News Network reported it asTrump administration’s DRP cost $6.7B last year, watchdog estimates (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
Attorneys for the Kennedy Center have argued in court that restoring Donald Trump's name to the institution is crucial for its financial survival. They claim the center faces a 'death spiral' if donors are not attracted by his prominent recognition.
Federal News Network reported it asKennedy Center risks financial ruin without Trump’s name, Justice Department argues (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
The Pentagon has fired Stars and Stripes editor-in-chief Erik Slavin, publisher Max Lederer, and reporter Lara Korte. Slavin stated he was dismissed for insubordination after an interview where he objected to potential military censorship of news for service members.
Federal News Network reported it asPentagon dismisses Stars and Stripes leadership after editor, reporter oppose military interference (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
Hundreds of approved maintenance projects at national parks have been relegated to a low priority list, potentially leaving them undone. Work prioritized by the White House, including repairs to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, has taken precedence.
Federal News Network reported it asNational park maintenance work sidelined as Trump’s Freedom 250 takes precedence (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
The US Army is disbanding a drone assault battalion established in Europe in January 2026 to test drone and robotic warfare tactics. The 600-soldier unit, part of the 173rd Airborne Brigade, will revert to its original role after an exercise in Germany. Military experts warn the move could slow adaptation to modern battlefields.
Federal News Network reported it asArmy will shut down a unit in Europe focused on learning drone warfare (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
US President Donald Trump signed a national security memorandum on 12 August 2026 authorising federal law enforcement to use cyber tools against transnational criminal organisations. The order establishes a programme for private-sector companies to conduct surveillance and disruption operations under government oversight, with participating firms required to post a $1 million bond.
Federal News Network reported it asTrump’s move to ‘unleash’ private sector hackers raises novel oversight, liability questions (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
The Pentagon revoked Frank Kendall’s security clearance on 7 August 2026 after an unauthorised disclosure about President Donald Trump’s Qatari-donated Air Force One. The $400 million jet, accepted last year, lacks the safety features of the older Boeing 747s, according to earlier remarks by Kendall.
Federal News Network reported it asFormer Air Force Secretary says he’ll sue Trump administration to restore his security clearance (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
The Senate confirmed Todd Blanche as US Attorney General by a 50-49 vote on 9 August 2026, with Republican Senator Bill Cassidy casting the deciding vote. Cassidy said he had concerns about Blanche’s commitment to the Constitution but cited positive aspects of his record.
Federal News Network reported it asTodd Blanche is sworn in as attorney general after bruising confirmation fight (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
A Government Accountability Office audit found the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, claimed $110bn in savings that were either inaccurate or unsupported. The report also revealed 128 of 206 DOGE employees had left by January 2026, and agencies withheld ethics records.
Federal News Network reported it asGAO finds 96% of DOGE’s claimed savings on federal grants cannot be verified (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote Tuesday on advancing acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s nomination after Republican senators secured written assurances that a $1.8 billion fund tied to the Trump-IRS settlement would not proceed. Democrats argue the guarantees fall short of permanent protections.
Federal News Network reported it asGOP holdouts say they will back Blanche’s attorney general nomination after striking deal over fund (opens Federal News Network in a new tab)
Who says so
2 organisations have published a rating for this outlet, in their own words. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Very high factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckhighCheck it
Who owns it
- Hubbard BroadcastingMedia Conglomeratedirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Chevy Chase, Montgomery County, Maryland, United States
- Official site
- federalnewsnetwork.com
- Seen publishing on
- federalnewsnetwork.com
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 10
- Reports listed
- 10
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 5 August 2026
10 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Federal News Network is rated centre, so there is no side for it to be counted against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 10 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Federal News Network: its report arrived a median of 31 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 20 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 20 September 2026. Ratings pulled 8 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Federal News Network, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Federal News Network publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.