Judge Blocks Trump Order Limiting Mail Balloting
A federal judge issued a new order freezing regulations that would have required pre-approval of ballot envelope designs and state uploads of recipient identities.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Judge Blocks Trump Order Limiting Mail Balloting
Photograph: The Hindu (embedded from source)
What this story says
- A federal judge in Washington, D.C. ordered the U.S. Postal Service not to implement President Donald Trump's executive order on mail balloting.
- The order was issued late Sunday, September 13, 2026, and freezes new regulations that would have required pre-approval of ballot envelope designs and state uploads of recipient identities.
- This is the second federal judge to block the order, with the Supreme Court now considering the administration's appeal of a previous injunction.
- Mail ballots are already being sent in several states, and a whistleblower report warned millions could be disenfranchised if the rule took effect.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 24 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 7 of the 31 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
57/100
Hype
41/100
31 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
Only 2 of the 24 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
A federal judge in Washington, D.C. issued an order late on Sunday, September 13, 2026, directing the U.S. Postal Service not to implement an executive order from President Donald Trump that would limit mail balloting. This ruling presents another challenge to the administration's attempts to alter election procedures, particularly as the Supreme Court is set to review the administration's appeal of a prior injunction.
The regulations in question would mandate that the Postal Service pre-approve all ballot envelope designs and require states to upload the identities of ballot recipients to an online portal. Mail ballots are already being distributed in states including Alabama, North Carolina, and Wisconsin, with more states preparing to send them out. A whistleblower report submitted to Congress indicated that millions of voters could be disenfranchised if these rules were to be enforced for the midterm elections.
Disagreement on Judge Nichols's previous ruling
The Hindu reported that U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols had previously refused to issue an injunction in May, ruling that the lawsuit was filed too early. The Hindu stated that this was the reasoning the Supreme Court used when it lifted an earlier freeze. However, following the administration's issuance of the new rule, plaintiffs in Boston and Washington, D.C. refiled their lawsuits. WKMG stated that Nichols in May had refused to issue an injunction because he ruled the lawsuit seeking one was brought too early, and that this was the high court's reasoning late last month when it lifted an earlier freeze by Talwani, but because the administration had just issued its rule to move ahead with Trump's plan, the plaintiffs in Boston and Washington, D.C., refiled their lawsuits.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated reports below mention the whistleblower report warning that millions could be disenfranchised if the rule took effect for the midterms. The left-rated and centre-rated reports mentioned this detail.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 14 Sept 2026, 09:00, and will add the sides that appear.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
12 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports highlighted that a second federal judge had frozen President Donald Trump's order limiting mail balloting. The Hindu, The Seattle Times, The Toronto Star, Bangor Daily News, The Record, and Welland Tribune.ca stated that the judge ordered the U.S. Postal Service not to implement the executive order. Several left-rated outlets, including The Hindu and HuffPost, detailed the specific requirements of the regulations: pre-approval of ballot envelope designs by the Postal Service and states uploading recipient identities to an online portal. The Hindu and HuffPost also mentioned a whistleblower report warning of potential disenfranchisement for millions of voters if the rule took effect for the midterms. The Hindu noted that mail balloting has been a frequent target for Trump, who has made unsubstantiated claims about its role in his 2020 election loss. The Hindu also pointed out the differing nominations of the judges involved, with Judge Indira Talwani nominated by former President Barack Obama and Judge Carl J. Nichols by Mr. Trump.
Centre
10 rated outlets
- Centre-rated reports focused on the judicial action freezing President Donald Trump's order on mail balloting. Outlets such as WKMG, Cecil Daily, Idaho Press, Daily Journal, Joplin Globe, Santa Maria Times, union-bulletin.com, and Winnipeg Free Press reported that a federal judge in Washington, D.C. ordered the U.S. Postal Service not to implement the executive order. Many of these reports also noted that the Supreme Court is considering the administration's appeal of a previous order by U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani in Boston. Several centre-rated outlets, including Cecil Daily, Idaho Press, Daily Journal, Joplin Globe, and Santa Maria Times, mentioned that mail ballots are already being sent out in at least three states: Alabama, North Carolina, and Wisconsin. WKMG and The Hindu also included the detail that a whistleblower report warned millions could be disenfranchised if the rule took effect for the midterms.
Right
2 rated outlets
- Right-rated reports from The Daily Sentinel and The National Herald stated that a federal judge in Washington, D.C. issued an order freezing President Donald Trump's attempt to limit mail voting for the midterm elections. These reports also mentioned that a previous order from another judge is already before the U.S. Supreme Court. The Daily Sentinel and The National Herald noted that election officials say it would be impossible to implement the changes this close to a general election.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Judge Blocks Trump Order Limiting Mail Balloting?
- Of the 24 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 50% are rated left, 42% are rated centre, 8% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 31. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Judge Blocks Trump Order Limiting Mail Balloting left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 24 rated outlets on this story, 50% are rated left, 42% are rated centre, 8% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Judge Blocks Trump Order Limiting Mail Balloting biased?
- Judge Blocks Trump Order Limiting Mail Balloting is one event reported by 31 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Judge Blocks Trump Order Limiting Mail Balloting?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Judge Blocks Trump Order Limiting Mail Balloting?
- 31 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What did the judge order regarding the mail ballot rules?
- A federal judge in Washington, D.C. ordered the U.S. Postal Service not to implement President Donald Trump's executive order that would limit mail balloting. This order freezes new regulations that would have required pre-approval of ballot envelope designs and states to upload recipient identities to an online portal.
- Why is this ruling significant?
- This is the second federal judge to issue an order blocking the Trump administration's mail balloting rules. The Supreme Court is now considering the administration's appeal of a previous injunction, making the judicial process central to the implementation of these election regulations.
- What are the potential consequences if the rule took effect?
- A whistleblower report warned that millions of people could be disenfranchised if the rule were allowed to take effect for the midterm elections. Mail ballots are already being sent out in several states, and election officials have stated that implementing such changes close to a general election would be impossible.
Read it at the source
31 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
12- Second Congressional Judge Blocked Trump's Appointment: Yet Another Objection to Insistence on Changing Selected Rules (opens Dnevni list Danas in a new tab)
Dnevni list Danas — is Dnevni list Danas biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with U.S. Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens The Hindu in a new tab)
- Judge: U.S. Postal Service May Not Implement Trump’s Mail Ballot Order (opens HuffPost in a new tab)
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens goSkagit in a new tab)
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Oskaloosa Herald in a new tab)
Oskaloosa Herald — is Oskaloosa Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Bangor Daily News in a new tab)
Bangor Daily News — is Bangor Daily News biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 4 more
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens ABC News in a new tab)
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens WellandTribune.ca in a new tab)
WellandTribune.ca — is WellandTribune.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Durango Herald in a new tab)
Durango Herald — is Durango Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
10- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme C (opens WBAL in a new tab)
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens somdnews.com in a new tab)
somdnews.com — is somdnews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens union-bulletin.com in a new tab)
union-bulletin.com — is union-bulletin.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Santa Maria Times in a new tab)
Santa Maria Times — is Santa Maria Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Joplin Globe in a new tab)
Joplin Globe — is Joplin Globe biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Daily Journal in a new tab)
Daily Journal — is Daily Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Idaho Press in a new tab)
Idaho Press — is Idaho Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Cecil Daily in a new tab)
Cecil Daily — is Cecil Daily biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 2 more
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens WKMG in a new tab)
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
2- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens The Daily Sentinel in a new tab)
The Daily Sentinel — is The Daily Sentinel biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second Federal Judge Freezes Trump Mail Ballot Order with US Supreme Court Poised to Weigh In (opens The National Herald in a new tab)
The National Herald — is The National Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
7- Second Federal Judge Blocks Trump Mail Ballot Order as Supreme Court Review Looms (opens NewsFinale in a new tab)
NewsFinale — is NewsFinale biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump-Appointed District Judge Blocks Trump’s Post Office Mail Voting EO (opens Mish Talk in a new tab)
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with U.S. Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens BizToc in a new tab)
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens Loonie Politics in a new tab)
Loonie Politics — is Loonie Politics biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens verdenews.com in a new tab)
verdenews.com — is verdenews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Second federal judge freezes Trump mail ballot order with US Supreme Court poised to weigh in (opens KXL in a new tab)
- Second Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Mail Ballot Order Ahead Of Midterms (opens FWRD AXIS in a new tab)
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


