Mississippi judge blocks AG's bid to dismiss ex-Capitol Police manslaughter case
Judge Faye Peterson said the attorney general's office showed bias for law enforcement, leaving open a possible second trial for former officer Michael Rhinewalt who admitted killing Jaylen Lewis.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Mississippi judge blocks AG's bid to dismiss ex-Capitol Police manslaughter case
Photograph: The Independent (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Judge Faye Peterson blocked the attorney general’s request to permanently dismiss the manslaughter case against former officer Michael Rhinewalt.
- Peterson said the AG’s office showed bias for law enforcement.
- Rhinewalt admitted killing 25‑year‑old Jaylen Lewis during a traffic stop.
- The ruling leaves open the possibility of a second trial.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 17 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
60/100
Hype
20/100
17 sources · methodology
A Hinds County circuit judge rejected the Mississippi attorney general’s bid to permanently end the manslaughter prosecution of former Capitol Police officer Michael Rhinewalt. Rhinewalt had previously admitted that he shot and killed 25‑year‑old Jaylen Lewis during a traffic stop. The judge found that the attorney general’s office showed bias for law‑enforcement officers and therefore could not abandon the case.
The attorney general’s office responded that, when a jury is dead‑locked, the benefit of the doubt should go to law‑enforcement officers. It filed a new request asking the court to temporarily drop the case, while the judge’s decision keeps open the chance that Rhinewalt could face a second trial.
““It doesn’t give me peace, but I can breathe a little bit knowing that she’s speaking out for my family, for my son,” said Arkela Lewis, mother of Jaylen Lewis.”
What the coverage left out
None of the left‑rated digests mention the judge’s finding that the attorney general’s office showed bias for law‑enforcement, nor do they note the AG’s statement that a tie benefits police officers. The right‑rated digests do not mention the possibility of a second trial for Rhinewalt.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 26 Oct 2026, 23:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
8 rated outlets
- All eight left‑rated digests reported that a Mississippi judge blocked the attorney general’s attempt to dismiss the manslaughter case and noted that the former officer had admitted killing a 25‑year‑old man. None of the left‑rated digests mentioned the judge’s finding of bias or the attorney general’s statement about a tie favouring law‑enforcement.
Centre
5 rated outlets
- The five centre‑rated reports, including the full WTOP article, covered the judge’s blockage, the officer’s admission, and the judge’s finding that the AG’s office showed bias for law‑enforcement. They also reproduced the attorney general’s claim that a tie benefits police, and they noted that the ruling leaves open the possibility of a second trial. The full report quoted the judge’s language, the victim’s mother and a law professor.
Right
4 rated outlets
- All three right‑rated digests reported that a Mississippi judge blocked the attorney general’s effort to permanently drop the manslaughter case and that the former officer had admitted killing a 25‑year‑old man. One of the digests (Owensboro Messenger‑Inquirer) also mentioned the judge’s finding of bias for law‑enforcement; the others did not reference bias or the AG’s tie‑benefit claim.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Mississippi judge blocks AG's bid to dismiss ex-Capitol Police…?
- Of the 17 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 47% are rated left, 29% are rated centre, 24% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Mississippi judge blocks AG's bid to dismiss ex-Capitol Police… left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 17 rated outlets on this story, 47% are rated left, 29% are rated centre, 24% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Mississippi judge blocks AG's bid to dismiss ex-Capitol Police… biased?
- Mississippi judge blocks AG's bid to dismiss ex-Capitol Police manslaughter case is one event reported by 17 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which outlets covered Mississippi judge blocks AG's bid to dismiss ex-Capitol Police…?
- 17 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What did the judge decide about the attorney general’s request?
- Judge Faye Peterson ruled that the attorney general’s bid to permanently dismiss the manslaughter case against former officer Michael Rhinewalt was improper, stating the AG’s office showed bias for law‑enforcement and therefore the case cannot be abandoned.
- What did the attorney general’s office say about ties in the case?
- The attorney general’s office issued a press release saying that, when a jury is dead‑locked, the benefit of the doubt should go to law‑enforcement officers, arguing that a tie favours police in such prosecutions.
- Does the ruling allow the case to be tried again?
- Yes, the judge’s decision leaves open the possibility of a second trial for Michael Rhinewalt, noting that a future attorney general could pursue prosecution once the current AG’s term ends.
- Did any outlet report the judge’s bias finding?
- All centre‑rated reports and one right‑rated digest (Owensboro Messenger‑Inquirer) reported the judge’s finding that the attorney general’s office showed bias for law‑enforcement; left‑rated digests did not mention this point.
Read it at the source
17 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
8- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens The Times-Tribune in a new tab)
The Times-Tribune — is The Times-Tribune biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens Kokomo Tribune in a new tab)
Kokomo Tribune — is Kokomo Tribune biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens St Catharines Standard in a new tab)
St Catharines Standard — is St Catharines Standard biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
5- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer – WTOP News (opens Washington Top News in a new tab)
Washington Top News — is Washington Top News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens Wral News in a new tab)
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens Ottumwa Courier in a new tab)
Ottumwa Courier — is Ottumwa Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens Mississippi Today in a new tab)
Mississippi Today — is Mississippi Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
4- Client Challenge (opens CT Insider in a new tab)
CT Insider — is CT Insider biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens Jonesboro Sun in a new tab)
Jonesboro Sun — is Jonesboro Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens MY Northwest in a new tab)
MY Northwest — is MY Northwest biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Judge rejects AG’s bid to permanently end case against ex-Capitol Police officer (opens Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer in a new tab)
Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer — is Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
