Is CT Insider biased?
The bias data this site ingests places CT Insider as leaning right. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is CT Insider biased?
The bias data this site ingests places CT Insider as leaning right. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is CT Insider left or right?
The bias data this site ingests places CT Insider as leaning right. It does not name the organisation that made that assessment, so we publish it as an unattributed rating and nothing more. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Right.
Is CT Insider reliable?
The factuality data this site ingests describes CT Insider as very high factuality. It reaches us without a named assessor, so it is an unattributed rating rather than our verdict. It does not guarantee that every report is correct.
What CT Insider has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with CT Insider’s own report linked underneath.
A Sacramento-based initiative sends volunteer lawyers to immigration courts, where 52% of pending deportation cases involve people without legal representation. Success rates for asylum claims rise from 19% to 47% with legal help, according to a 2024 study.
CT Insider reported it asMany immigrants face deportation without a lawyer at their side in court. This program tries to help (opens CT Insider in a new tab)
Two haboob dust storms struck the Phoenix area within three days in early August 2026, both classified as Category 5 events. Researchers at Arizona State University said the storms were unprecedented in frequency and intensity, with wind speeds of 50 mph and visibility reduced to half a mile.
CT Insider reported it asUnusually intense haboob dust storms strike Phoenix twice this week (opens CT Insider in a new tab)
Who says so
The lean above is carried in the coverage data this site ingests, which names no rater for it. We publish it because it is what the rest of the site groups CT Insider on, and we will not present it as an assessment by anyone in particular until we hold one.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Very high factuality
The rating above reaches us without a named assessor, and is published as that rather than as anyone’s verdict.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for CT Insider.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Norwalk, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States
- Seen publishing on
- ctinsider.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 6 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
On 1 of those stories, outlets rated right were largely absent from the coverage and CT Insider ran the story anyway.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of CT Insider: its report arrived a median of 5 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 9 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 9 August 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as CT Insider, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where CT Insider publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.