Skip to the story
All stories

New York prosecutor alleges Letitia James' office targeted Trump without cause

Assistant Attorney General Daniel Wiesenfeld claimed his supervisor instructed him to pursue crimes involving Trump, Truth Social and Hewlett-Packard

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
New York prosecutor alleges Letitia James' office targeted Trump without cause

What this story says

  • Assistant Attorney General Daniel Wiesenfeld sent an email to over 2,000 employees alleging he was instructed to target Donald Trump, Truth Social and Hewlett-Packard without credible reasons.
  • The email was deleted from the Attorney General's servers and employee inboxes after being sent on 29 August 2026.
  • New York GOP Chair Ed Cox called Letitia James unfit to serve, while the AG's office dismissed the claims as a personnel issue.
  • The Times Union first reported the email and Wiesenfeld's allegations on 29 August 2026.

Who covered it

Left 5%(2)Centre 6%(3)Right 89%(39)

Percentages are shares of the 44 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 9 of the 53 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

78/100

Craft

75/100

Hype

35/100

53 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 2 of the 44 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Assistant Attorney General Daniel Wiesenfeld sent an email to more than 2,000 employees in the New York Attorney General's office on 29 August 2026. He alleged that his supervisor, Investor Protection Bureau chief Shamiso Maswoswe, instructed him to "find and pursue crimes committed by specific individuals and organisations affiliated with Donald Trump" without a credible reason. The email named Trump, his social media platform Truth Social, and Hewlett-Packard as targets.

Wiesenfeld's email was deleted from the office's servers and removed from employee inboxes. The Attorney General's office later sent a follow-up email from general counsel Kumiki Gibson, describing the matter as internal and stating no employees were in danger. A spokesperson for the office called it a personnel issue and rejected assertions of political targeting, as reported by the Times Union.

New York GOP Chair Ed Cox issued a statement on 30 August 2026, calling Attorney General Letitia James "utterly unfit to serve" and accusing her of weaponising the office into a "political hit squad". Cox endorsed James' Republican challenger, Saritha Komatireddy, in the upcoming midterm elections. The Times Union first reported Wiesenfeld's email and allegations on 29 August 2026.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mentioned the cost of the investigations Wiesenfeld alleged were politically motivated. The left-rated Lohud report was the only one to include the AG's office response dismissing the matter as a personnel issue. None of the centre-rated digests carried the follow-up email from general counsel Kumiki Gibson.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 2 Sept 2026, 20:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

2 rated outlets

  • The two left-rated digests led on the accusation that the Attorney General's office targeted Donald Trump and his associates. Both carried the claim that Wiesenfeld was instructed to pursue crimes without credible reasons. Neither digest mentioned the deletion of the email or the follow-up message from the AG's general counsel.
  • Lohud, the only left-rated outlet with a full report, quoted New York GOP Chair Ed Cox calling James "utterly unfit to serve" and describing the office as a "political hit squad". The report included the AG's office response, which dismissed the matter as a personnel issue and denied political targeting. It also detailed James' history of legal disputes with Trump, including a 2024 civil fraud case that was later overturned.

Centre

3 rated outlets

  • The three centre-rated digests all led on the instruction to "find and pursue crimes" involving Trump. Two of the three mentioned the deletion of the email. None of the digests quoted the AG's office response or the follow-up email from general counsel Kumiki Gibson.

Right

39 rated outlets

  • Fourteen right-rated digests led on the allegation that the Attorney General's office targeted Trump without cause. Nine of the fourteen used the phrase "find and pursue crimes" in their opening lines. Six digests mentioned the deletion of the email, while none carried the AG's office response or the follow-up message from general counsel Kumiki Gibson.
  • The right-rated digests frequently described the incident as evidence of political weaponisation. Four used the term "whistleblower" to describe Wiesenfeld, and three referred to the office as a "political hit squad". None of the digests included the AG's office statement rejecting assertions of political targeting.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover New York prosecutor alleges Letitia James' office targeted Trump…?
Of the 44 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 5% are rated left, 6% are rated centre, 89% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 53. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is New York prosecutor alleges Letitia James' office targeted Trump… left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 89% of the 44 rated outlets on it are rated right — so far this is a story carried mostly by the right. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.
Is the coverage of New York prosecutor alleges Letitia James' office targeted Trump… biased?
New York prosecutor alleges Letitia James' office targeted Trump without cause is one event reported by 53 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting New York prosecutor alleges Letitia James' office targeted Trump…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered New York prosecutor alleges Letitia James' office targeted Trump…?
53 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Who is Daniel Wiesenfeld?
Daniel Wiesenfeld is an Assistant Attorney General in the New York Attorney General's office. He sent an email alleging he was instructed to target Donald Trump, Truth Social and Hewlett-Packard without credible reasons. The email was later deleted from servers and employee inboxes.
What did the Attorney General's office say about the email?
A spokesperson for the Attorney General's office called the matter a personnel issue and rejected assertions of political targeting. The office also sent a follow-up email stating no employees were in danger, as reported by the Times Union.
Which outlets reported the deletion of the email?
The deletion of the email was reported by Lohud, the Times Union, and six of the fourteen right-rated digests. The centre-rated digests also mentioned it in two of the three reports.
Did any outlet quote the AG's office response?
The AG's office response was quoted only in the left-rated Lohud report. None of the centre-rated or right-rated digests included the statement rejecting assertions of political targeting.

Read it at the source

53 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

2

Centre

3

Right

39
Show 31 more

Not rated

9
Show 1 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

How every side covered the Trump targeting allegations | MediaBias News