Arizona Daily Independent media bias and reliability
Media Bias/Fact Check places Arizona Daily Independent on the right. We have seen it on 7 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Arizona Daily Independent biased?
Media Bias/Fact Check places Arizona Daily Independent on the right. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Arizona Daily Independent left or right?
Media Bias/Fact Check places Arizona Daily Independent on the right. In the three-way grouping used on story pages, that puts it under Right.
Is Arizona Daily Independent reliable?
The factual-reliability assessments we hold for Arizona Daily Independent are Media Bias/Fact Check: Mixed factuality. These are outlet-level assessments, not a guarantee that every report is correct.
What Arizona Daily Independent has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Arizona Daily Independent’s own report linked underneath.
The U.S. Federal Reserve has raised its key interest rate by 25 basis points, marking the first such increase in over three years. The unanimous decision aims to combat inflation, and was followed by a significant drop in gold prices.
Arizona Daily Independent reported it asFed Raises Rates, but What Does That Really Mean for Homebuyers? (opens Arizona Daily Independent in a new tab)
A newly unveiled statue of Charlie Kirk at Turning Point USA's Phoenix headquarters was defaced with red paint. The vandalism occurred days after the statue's unveiling and coincided with the one-year anniversary of Kirk's assassination.
Arizona Daily Independent reported it asArizona Leaders Condemn Attack on Charlie Kirk Memorial (opens Arizona Daily Independent in a new tab)
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History is commemorating the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks with an exhibit of artifacts. The display includes personal items from the day, presented openly due to fragility, as museum leadership navigates political criticism.
Arizona Daily Independent reported it as9/11 We Must Never Forget (opens Arizona Daily Independent in a new tab)
Police in Tucson, Arizona, are investigating a shooting outside a gay bar as a possible hate crime. Three people, including the shooter, died in the incident. The suspect was found with a note listing LGBTQIA+-associated businesses.
Arizona Daily Independent reported it asArizona Legislator Calls Tucson Hate-Crime Shooting ‘Radical Islamic Terrorism,’ Rebukes Arizona Democrats (opens Arizona Daily Independent in a new tab)
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed lawsuits against Arizona, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington. The department alleges that state laws offering in-state tuition and financial aid to undocumented students discriminate against U.S. citizens and violate federal law.
Arizona Daily Independent reported it asDOJ Files Complaints Against Arizona, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington for Providing In-State Tuition to Illegal Aliens (opens Arizona Daily Independent in a new tab)
Jill Biden said she cannot explain her husband's performance in the 2024 debate. She stated doctors ruled out a stroke but responded 'Who knows?' when asked if his drink could have been laced.
Arizona Daily Independent reported it asSedate Debate: Sunday’s Comic (opens Arizona Daily Independent in a new tab)
A hacker extracted 633,000 voter registration records from Maricopa County, Arizona, in 2020, including sensitive data on 930 individuals. The FBI confirmed the breach and urged prosecution, but four prosecutors refused to press charges, closing the case by 2023.
Arizona Daily Independent reported it asA Hack Hacked: Sunday’s Comic (opens Arizona Daily Independent in a new tab)
Who says so
One organisation has published a rating for this outlet. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the useful part and it is left standing.
- Media Bias/Fact CheckrightCheck it
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
Mixed factuality
- Media Bias/Fact CheckmixedCheck it
Who owns it
- American Daily Independent News Network LLCIndependentdirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Glendale, Maricopa County, Arizona, United States
- Official site
- arizonadailyindependent.com
- Seen publishing on
- arizonadailyindependent.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 7
- Reports listed
- 7
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 10 August 2026
7 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
On 2 of those stories, outlets rated right were largely absent from the coverage and Arizona Daily Independent ran the story anyway.
Across the 7 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Arizona Daily Independent: its report arrived a median of 27 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 25 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 22 September 2026. Ratings pulled 10 September 2026.
Other outlets rated the same way
Publishers carrying the same published leaning as Arizona Daily Independent, also publishing from United States, ordered by how often we have seen them on a story. Sharing a rating is not the same as being alike.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Arizona Daily Independent publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.