divyabhaskar media bias and reliability
divyabhaskar is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 6 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is divyabhaskar biased?
divyabhaskar is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is divyabhaskar left or right?
divyabhaskar is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is divyabhaskar reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for divyabhaskar. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What divyabhaskar has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with divyabhaskar’s own report linked underneath.
Fitch Ratings increased its forecast for India's economic growth in FY27 to 6.9% from 6.4%, while S&P Global Ratings raised its projection to 7% from 6.6%. Both agencies cited strong economic activity, consumption, and investment as key drivers.
divyabhaskar reported it asFitch Raises India's GDP Growth Estimate to 6.9%: June Quarter's 7.8% Growth Is the Reason, RBI May Increase Interest Rates by 0.25% (opens divyabhaskar in a new tab)
OpenAI has announced that an internal AI model has produced a solution to the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem, one of mathematics' seven Millennium Prize Problems. The company claims approximately 10,000 AI agents worked on the problem for 88 hours. However, mathematicians have expressed skepticism due to the lack of a publicly disclosed proof.
divyabhaskar reported it asOpenAI Solved a 100-Year-Old Math Puzzle in Just 88 Hours: 10,000 AI Agents Found the Answer to 1 of the World's 7 Most Difficult Questions, Even Mathematicians Were Stunned (opens divyabhaskar in a new tab)
Eight South Koreans working on a hydropower plant project are missing and 10 others are stranded after a flash flood in Nepal. South Korea's Foreign Ministry has established a task force and plans to send a response team to the affected Rasuwa district.
divyabhaskar reported it as18 Gujaratis Missing in Nepal Floods: Patel Couple From Ahmedabad Living in New Zealand Missing, Bhavin Rawal From Ahmedabad Living in Australia Missing on His Birthday (opens divyabhaskar in a new tab)
A 24-year-old Nepali labourer survived a flash flood by clinging to a mango tree after being swept away by a torrent of mud and rock. The disaster has killed at least 150 people and left hundreds missing in Nepal.
divyabhaskar reported it as18 Gujaratis Missing in Nepal Floods: Patel Couple From Ahmedabad Living in New Zealand Missing, Bhavin Rawal From Ahmedabad Living in Australia Missing on His Birthday (opens divyabhaskar in a new tab)
Flash floods and landslides swept away villages along the Nepal-Tibet border, killing at least 165 people. Experts suggest a glacial collapse, not an earthquake, was the cause, with climate change and the region's topography exacerbating the risks.
divyabhaskar reported it as9 Satellite Images Before and After Nepal's Devastation: Settlements Washed Away in Trishuli River, 6-Hour Flood Changes Map (opens divyabhaskar in a new tab)
A scheme in Russia involves women marrying soldiers before deployment to claim death benefits if they are killed. The scam has sparked investigations and public outrage, with families of deceased soldiers left without compensation. Reports vary on the scale and response from authorities.
divyabhaskar reported it asScam of Women Marrying for Death Compensation Exposed in Russia: Cases of Marriage with Wounded Soldiers Increase, Hospitals and Army Also Accused of Collusion (opens divyabhaskar in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed divyabhaskar. We asked on 9 September 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
- D B Corp Ltd.Media Conglomeratedirect owner
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- India
- Official site
- divyabhaskar.co.in
- Seen publishing on
- divyabhaskar.co.in
- Access
- Free to read
- Wikipedia
- Entry
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 6
- Reports listed
- 6
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 6 August 2026
6 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. divyabhaskar has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 6 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of divyabhaskar: its report arrived a median of 34 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 23 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 23 September 2026. Ratings pulled 9 September 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where divyabhaskar publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.