Pandaily media bias and reliability
Pandaily is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 3 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Pandaily biased?
Pandaily is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Pandaily left or right?
Pandaily is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Pandaily reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Pandaily. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Pandaily has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Pandaily’s own report linked underneath.
Huawei's "Intelligent World 2035" report forecasts a dramatic increase in autonomous AI agents, predicting they will account for over 90% of global AI token traffic by 2035. The report anticipates 900 billion such agents will be active globally, a figure roughly 100 times the projected human population.
Pandaily reported it asHuawei Maps Intelligent World 2035 Around Agent Token Traffic and Ten Tech Directions (opens Pandaily in a new tab)
A Chinese humanoid robot developed by Honor has run 100 meters in 9.32 seconds, surpassing Usain Bolt's world record. The robot reached a peak speed of 14.5 meters per second during a test.
Pandaily reported it asWorld Humanoid Robot Games 2.0: Robots Move From Fast Times to Real-World Work (opens Pandaily in a new tab)
The Trump administration is drafting a ban on Chinese-made devices used in US data centres, extending a campaign to exclude Chinese technology from critical infrastructure. The move follows recent prohibitions on Chinese humanoid robots and power inverters, with enforcement challenges and industry costs expected.
Pandaily reported it asChina's Optical Modules, PCBs, and Domestic AI Chips: A Day in the Market (opens Pandaily in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Pandaily. We asked on 4 September 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Pandaily.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- China
- Official site
- pandaily.com
- Seen publishing on
- pandaily.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 3
- Reports listed
- 3
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
3 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Pandaily has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 3 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Pandaily: its report arrived a median of 32 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 19 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 19 September 2026. Ratings pulled 4 September 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Pandaily publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.