RAGEX media bias and reliability
RAGEX is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 8 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is RAGEX biased?
RAGEX is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is RAGEX left or right?
RAGEX is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is RAGEX reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for RAGEX. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What RAGEX has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with RAGEX’s own report linked underneath.
Jordan's armed forces stated that 18 out of 20 ballistic missiles launched from Iran were intercepted and destroyed by air defence systems. Two missiles landed in unpopulated areas without causing casualties. Iran's IRGC claimed to have targeted a US military base in Jordan.
RAGEX reported it asIranian Strikes Hit U.S. Jets In Jordan As War Escalates (opens RAGEX in a new tab)
Algeria has announced the severance of diplomatic relations with the United Arab Emirates and the closure of its airspace to UAE-registered civilian and military aircraft. Commercial flights will be exempt until 2026. The UAE expressed hope the decision is temporary.
RAGEX reported it asAlgeria Officially Cuts Diplomatic Ties With The United Arab Emirates (opens RAGEX in a new tab)
The United Arab Emirates announced a full suspension of trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran on 18 August 2026, citing regional escalation after Iranian ballistic missiles were detected targeting maritime navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has not claimed responsibility for the attacks on UAE state-owned ADNOC vessels.
RAGEX reported it asUAE Freezes All Trade With Iran (opens RAGEX in a new tab)
The Israeli military has located the remains of Yehuda Katz, missing since the 1982 Battle of Sultan Yaqub during the First Lebanon War. The discovery follows the recovery of two other soldiers from the same battle in recent years, with Russia previously assisting in the search.
RAGEX reported it asRemains Of Missing IDF Soldier Located (opens RAGEX in a new tab)
The US has imposed tariffs of up to 100% on drones and components, effective 3 September 2026, to address national security concerns and reduce dependence on Chinese imports. Drones over 25 kilograms or with thermal imaging face the highest duties, while smaller drones are subject to lower tariffs.
RAGEX reported it asTrump Orders Return To Steam Catapults (opens RAGEX in a new tab)
US President Donald Trump flew secretly from Turkey on an alternate military aircraft last month after an Iranian assassination threat was detected, according to reports. The White House had stated he was aboard Air Force One, but the press was left on a decoy flight as part of an elaborate ruse to conceal his departure.
RAGEX reported it asTrump Secretly Evacuated From Turkey (opens RAGEX in a new tab)
The International Atomic Energy Agency will remove yellowcake uranium from a clandestine Syrian site known as Site 99, following a deal brokered by the United States involving Syria and Israel. The material, linked to a reactor bombed by Israel in 2007, was stored at the site after the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime.
RAGEX reported it asUS Brokers Secret Syrian Nuclear Deal (opens RAGEX in a new tab)
A drone carrying approximately 800 grams of Semtex was discovered near a Ukrainian cargo plane at Leipzig/Halle Airport on 5 August 2026. German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt described the incident as a 'new threat scenario', while outlets diverged on attributing responsibility and the plane's cargo.
RAGEX reported it asGerman Airport Halts Over Drone Scare (opens RAGEX in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed RAGEX. We asked on 10 September 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for RAGEX.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- ragex.co
- Seen publishing on
- ragex.co
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 8
- Reports listed
- 8
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 9 August 2026
8 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. RAGEX has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 8 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of RAGEX: its report arrived a median of 19 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 25 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 16 September 2026. Ratings pulled 10 September 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where RAGEX publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.