Skip to the story
All stories

Airbus finds Air India A320 lost control for four seconds before 300-foot drop

Preliminary analysis shows all three hydraulic systems failed simultaneously, injuring 24 on 4 August flight

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
L'avion A320neo Air India est actuellement stationné à l'aéroport de New Delhi. (Illustration) • © T. MUGHAL / EPA

What this story says

  • An Air India Airbus A320 lost about 300 feet of altitude on 4 August 2026 during a flight from Phuket to Delhi, injuring 24 people.
  • The aircraft briefly lost control of elevators and ailerons for approximately four seconds due to simultaneous hydraulic system failures.
  • Airbus’s preliminary analysis found no cause for the pressure loss, and Indian authorities are investigating the incident as serious.
  • The flight’s captain tested positive for marijuana, but no link to the incident has been established.

Who covered it

Left 23%(5)Centre 9%(2)Right 68%(15)

Percentages are shares of the 22 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 8 of the 30 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

64/100

Craft

85/100

Hype

15/100

30 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 5 of the 22 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

An Air India Airbus A320 operating flight AI2379 from Phuket to Delhi lost approximately 300 feet of altitude on 4 August 2026. The sudden drop injured 24 people on board, including passengers and crew. The aircraft landed safely in Delhi after the incident.

A preliminary technical assessment by Airbus, the aircraft’s manufacturer, found that all three hydraulic systems lost pressure within seconds of each other. The failure left the pilots unable to control the elevators and ailerons for about four seconds. During that time, the aircraft pitched upward before the systems recovered and control was restored.

The cause of the hydraulic pressure loss remains unclear. Airbus has requested further inspections of the aircraft’s hydraulic systems, sensors, and wiring. The Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is leading the investigation, with assistance from Airbus and France’s Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses (BEA).

Disagreement on duration of control loss

Most reports state the aircraft lost control for approximately four seconds. India Today and ABP News, however, reported the loss of control lasted seven seconds, citing Airbus’s interim findings. The discrepancy has not been resolved by the sources.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mentioned the captain’s positive marijuana test or Air India’s subsequent drug testing policy. The centre-rated report by Channel News Asia carried both details. The left-rated reports included them.

franceinfo.fr’s full report was the only one to specify the names of the hydraulic systems (Green, Blue, Yellow) and to report Airbus’s request for structural inspections due to forces exceeding design limits.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 14 Aug 2026, 12:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

An Air India Airbus A320neo passenger plane moves on the runway after landing at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, in Ahmedabad, India, Oct 22, 2021. (File photo: REUTERS/Amit Dave)
Channel News AsiaCentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

5 rated outlets

  • The five left-rated digests led on the technical cause of the incident. OnManorama, One India, and the Indian Express reported the simultaneous failure of all three hydraulic systems. The Independent and franceinfo.fr highlighted the captain’s positive marijuana test, with franceinfo.fr quoting Airbus’s description of the pilots’ inability to respond during the control loss.
  • franceinfo.fr’s full report described the hydraulic systems as “vert, bleu et jaune” and noted Airbus’s request for structural inspections due to forces exceeding specified limits. It also reported Air India’s introduction of mandatory drug testing for pilots following the incident.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • Channel News Asia’s full report led on the brief loss of key flight controls, attributing the detail to an Airbus analysis reviewed by Reuters. It reported the pilots’ inability to use elevators and ailerons for about four seconds and noted Airbus’s request for tests on hydraulic systems and sensors.
  • The report mentioned the captain’s positive marijuana test but stated no link to the incident had been established. It also noted Air India’s initial description of the event as turbulence-related, which was later dropped.

Right

15 rated outlets

  • The 13 right-rated digests focused on the technical failure and its immediate effects. India TV News, Latestly, and Moneycontrol reported the simultaneous failure of all three hydraulic systems. India Today and ABP News led on the duration of the control loss, reporting it as seven seconds.
  • Several outlets, including rediff.com and The Hindu Business Line, noted the pilots’ inability to control the aircraft during the incident. The Straits Times and Free Malaysia Today reported the number of injured but did not mention the captain’s marijuana test or Air India’s drug testing policy.

Read it at the source

30 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

5

Centre

2

Right

15
Show 7 more

Not rated

8

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Airbus finds Air India A320 lost control for four seconds before…?
Of the 22 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 23% are rated left, 9% are rated centre, 68% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 30. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Airbus finds Air India A320 lost control for four seconds before… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 22 rated outlets on this story, 23% are rated left, 9% are rated centre, 68% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Airbus finds Air India A320 lost control for four seconds before… biased?
Airbus finds Air India A320 lost control for four seconds before 300-foot drop is one event reported by 30 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Airbus finds Air India A320 lost control for four seconds before…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Airbus finds Air India A320 lost control for four seconds before…?
30 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What caused the Air India A320 to lose altitude?
The aircraft lost approximately 300 feet of altitude on 4 August 2026 after all three hydraulic systems failed simultaneously. The failure left pilots unable to control elevators and ailerons for about four seconds. The cause of the hydraulic pressure loss remains unclear.
How many people were injured in the incident?
Twenty-four people were injured during the sudden altitude loss on the Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi. The injured included passengers and crew members. The aircraft landed safely in Delhi after the incident.
Did the captain’s marijuana test affect the investigation?
The flight’s captain tested positive for marijuana in a confirmatory drug test after the incident. No link between the test result and the altitude loss has been established. Air India has since introduced mandatory drug testing for all pilots.
Which outlets reported the duration of the control loss differently?
Most reports stated the aircraft lost control for approximately four seconds. India Today and ABP News, however, reported the loss of control lasted seven seconds, citing Airbus’s interim findings. The discrepancy remains unresolved.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Air India A320 lost control for 4 seconds before 300-foot drop | MediaBias News