Skip to the story
All stories

Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in Taxes

Company used a decades-old tax credit, with its own accountants flagging the strategy as risky.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in Taxes

What this story says

  • Meta has classified its AI data centers as 'pilot models' or 'experimental' to claim federal research tax credits.
  • The company saved approximately $4 billion in taxes in 2024 and $3.9 billion in 2025, totaling nearly $6 billion.
  • The tax credit used by Meta dates back to the 1980s and is intended to encourage innovation and research.
  • Meta's own accountants have flagged this tax strategy as potentially risky and subject to challenge by the IRS.

Who covered it

Left 60%(9)Centre 20%(3)Right 20%(3)

Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 18 of the 33 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

45/100

33 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 3 of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Meta has classified its artificial intelligence data centers as 'pilot models' or 'experimental' to claim federal research tax credits. This classification allowed the company to save approximately $4 billion in taxes in 2024 and $3.9 billion in 2025, according to reports. The total savings amount to nearly $6 billion.

The tax credit Meta is utilizing was established in the 1980s to encourage innovation and research. However, Meta's own accountants have flagged this tax strategy as potentially risky and subject to challenge by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). According to the New York Times, Meta is the largest claimant of this particular tax credit.

Disagreement on tax savings figures

Reports differ on the exact amount Meta saved in taxes. Tech Radar states Meta saved $4 billion last year and $3.9 billion in 2025, totaling almost $6 billion. Futurism states Meta is writing off its data center construction projects as 'pilot models' to claim a Reagan-era tax credit. WebProNews reports that Meta tells the government a different tale when tax time arrives. Benzinga reports Meta's AI spending has a $3.9 billion tax perk. FuturoProssimo reports Meta cuts taxes by $3.6 billion. IBTimes UK and TNW report Meta claimed nearly $3.9 billion in US research tax credits in 2025. Haberler reports Meta received a $4 billion tax break by classifying its AI data center as an 'experiment'. The Decoder and The Decoder.de report that in 2025 alone, Meta saved $3.9 billion. 1prime.ru reports Meta uses its data centers to reduce US tax payments by billions of dollars.

What the coverage left out

None of the left, centre, or right-rated reports mention the specific figure of $32.1 billion for the estimated cost of experimental tax credits to the US government in 2025, as reported by Tech Radar. Additionally, none of the right-rated reports mention the detail that Meta's auditor, EY, approved the plan and suggested other companies adopt this approach, as reported by Tech Radar.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 3 Oct 2026, 22:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in Taxes
CumhuriyetLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

9 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports focused on Meta's use of the 'experimental' or 'pilot model' classification for its AI data centers to achieve significant tax savings. Multiple outlets highlighted that this strategy allowed Meta to save billions, with figures around $3.9 billion for 2025 frequently mentioned. Reports also noted that Meta's own accountants flagged this approach as risky. Some left-rated reports questioned whether taxpayers should be subsidizing Meta's AI data centers, as seen in ITEP's headline. Futurism stated Meta is using its AI data centers to avoid paying billions in taxes, and Mashable noted that Meta has been treating its AI data centers as experimental facilities to claim billions in federal research tax credits. IndexHR reported on how Meta is using data centers to save billions in taxes, while simultaneously telling investors these projects bring huge business success.

Centre

3 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports highlighted Meta's classification of AI data centers as 'pilot models' or 'experimental' to secure billions in federal tax credits. Tech Radar reported that Meta told the IRS its AI data centers are experimental to shave $6 billion off its tax bill, noting that the company's auditor, EY, approved the plan. WebProNews framed the situation as Meta's 'Tax Gambit,' turning AI data centers into a multi-billion-dollar federal subsidy. Benzinga reported on Meta's AI spending having a $3.9 billion tax perk, with the company reportedly classifying data centers as pilot models.

Right

3 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports focused on Meta exploiting a tax credit loophole to reduce its tax burden. [your]NEWS reported that Meta used a research tax credit to cut billions from taxes on AI data center spending. News-pravda.com stated Meta is exploiting a tax credit loophole for its data centers, which allowed the company to skirt $3.9 billion in 2025 taxes. Next News Network reported that Meta faces blowback over its tax claim, noting that a New York Times investigation alleging Meta classified data centers as experimental to avoid billions in federal taxes is drawing sharp reaction online.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in…?
Of the 15 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 60% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 20% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 33. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 15 rated outlets on this story, 60% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 20% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in… biased?
Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in Taxes is one event reported by 33 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Meta Classified AI Data Centers as 'Experimental' to Save Billions in…?
33 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
How much tax has Meta saved by classifying its AI data centers as experimental?
Meta has reportedly saved approximately $4 billion in taxes in 2024 and $3.9 billion in 2025. This brings the total savings to nearly $6 billion through the classification of its AI data centers as 'pilot models' or 'experimental' to claim federal research tax credits.
What is the tax credit Meta is using?
Meta is using a federal research tax credit that dates back to the 1980s. This credit is intended to encourage innovation and research within companies. However, Meta's own accountants have flagged this strategy as potentially risky and subject to challenge by the IRS.
Is Meta the only company using this tax credit?
According to the New York Times, Meta is the largest claimant of this particular tax credit. While the credit is available to encourage innovation, Meta's scale of usage makes it the biggest beneficiary among companies utilizing it.

Read it at the source

33 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

9
Show 1 more

Centre

3

Right

3

Not rated

18
Show 10 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Meta AI Data Centers Tax Savings | MediaBias News