Skip to the story
All stories

US officials reject cool water release from Lake Powell to protect hydropower

Federal Bureau of Reclamation cites strain on electricity generation as reason for decision affecting threatened fish

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Climate Colorado River Cold Releases

What this story says

  • The Bureau of Reclamation will not release cool water from Lake Powell in 2026, citing hydropower generation concerns.
  • Lake Powell is 23% full, and the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam is about 69°F (20.5°C).
  • The decision affects the humpback chub, a threatened fish species, and follows record-low snowpack in the Colorado River Basin.
  • Utilities warned that cool water releases could increase electricity costs for millions of customers.

Who covered it

Left 47%(7)Centre 46%(7)Right 7%(1)

Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 16 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

96/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

12/100

16 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 1 of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Federal officials announced on 6 August 2026 that they will not release cool water this year from Lake Powell, a major reservoir on the Colorado River. The decision, communicated in an email by the Bureau of Reclamation, prioritises hydropower generation over measures to protect the humpback chub, a threatened fish species downstream of Glen Canyon Dam in northern Arizona.

The Bureau of Reclamation said the decision was made "due to significant hydropower generation concerns under already strained system conditions." Lake Powell is currently about 23% full, and the river downstream of the dam is approximately 69°F (20.5°C). The Bureau considers recommending cool water releases when downstream temperatures exceed 60°F (15.5°C) for three consecutive days, a threshold that has been regularly surpassed for over a month.

Cool water releases, known as "cool mix flows," involve releasing water from deeper, colder layers of the reservoir. These releases have been used in previous years to lower river temperatures and prevent the spawning of smallmouth bass, an invasive species that threatens the humpback chub. However, the deep water layers lack hydropower turbines, meaning such releases would reduce electricity generation.

The decision follows the worst snowpack on record for the Colorado River Basin, which supplies water to over 40 million people across seven US states, tribal nations, and Mexico. It also comes a week after federal officials proposed water cuts for California, Nevada, and Arizona to address the river's dwindling resources.

What the coverage left out

None of the digests from the left-rated outlets mentioned the specific temperature threshold the Bureau of Reclamation uses to consider cool water releases. The centre-rated KMGH report and the Associated Press report both included this detail. The right-rated digest did not mention the humpback chub by name or the species' threatened status.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 16 times, most recently on 7 Aug 2026, 16:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

A sign reading "keep out" is displayed just upstream of Glen Canyon Dam at Lake Powell, June 8, 2022, in Page, Ariz. (AP Photo/Brittany Peterson, File)
Associated Press NewsLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

7 rated outlets

  • The seven left-rated digests and the Associated Press report led on the decision's impact on the humpback chub, a threatened species. The Associated Press report, the only full article from this side, quoted Matt Rice of American Rivers, who called the decision "disappointing" and warned it could be a "death sentence" for the fish. The report also noted the life-threatening temperatures for the nearby rainbow trout fishery.
  • The Associated Press report described the decision as pitting "conservation of the humpback chub against ratepayer costs for electricity." It included the Bureau of Reclamation's statement that cool water releases in 2024 and 2025 had successfully prevented smallmouth bass spawning. The report also carried the utilities' warning that alternative energy purchases could increase electricity bills for customers.

Centre

7 rated outlets

  • The seven centre-rated digests and the KMGH report led on the hydropower concerns cited by the Bureau of Reclamation. The KMGH report, the only full article from this side, quoted Andy Colosimo of the Colorado River Energy Distributors Association, who called the decision "the right call" given the river's conditions. The report described the strain on hydropower production and the potential costs to utilities and ratepayers if cool water releases had proceeded.
  • The KMGH report included the Bureau of Reclamation's email statement in full and noted the record-low snowpack and the federal proposal for water cuts. It also explained the mechanics of cool mix flows and the risk posed by smallmouth bass to the humpback chub. The report quoted Wayne G. Pullan of the Bureau, who outlined alternative measures to address the smallmouth bass invasion.

Right

1 rated outlet

  • The single right-rated digest, from the Madison Courier, led on the decision not to release cool water and the strain on hydropower production. It noted that supporters of cool water releases had argued for their effectiveness but did not include any quotes or additional context beyond the basic facts of the decision.

Read it at the source

16 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

7

Centre

7

Right

1

Not rated

1

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

US rejects Lake Powell water release for hydropower over fish | MediaBias News