US officials reject cool water release from Lake Powell to protect hydropower
Federal Bureau of Reclamation cites strain on electricity generation as reason for decision affecting threatened fish
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Climate Colorado River Cold Releases
Photograph: KMGH (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The Bureau of Reclamation will not release cool water from Lake Powell in 2026, citing hydropower generation concerns.
- Lake Powell is 23% full, and the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam is about 69°F (20.5°C).
- The decision affects the humpback chub, a threatened fish species, and follows record-low snowpack in the Colorado River Basin.
- Utilities warned that cool water releases could increase electricity costs for millions of customers.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 16 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
96/100
Craft
95/100
Hype
12/100
16 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
Only 1 of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Federal officials announced on 6 August 2026 that they will not release cool water this year from Lake Powell, a major reservoir on the Colorado River. The decision, communicated in an email by the Bureau of Reclamation, prioritises hydropower generation over measures to protect the humpback chub, a threatened fish species downstream of Glen Canyon Dam in northern Arizona.
The Bureau of Reclamation said the decision was made "due to significant hydropower generation concerns under already strained system conditions." Lake Powell is currently about 23% full, and the river downstream of the dam is approximately 69°F (20.5°C). The Bureau considers recommending cool water releases when downstream temperatures exceed 60°F (15.5°C) for three consecutive days, a threshold that has been regularly surpassed for over a month.
Cool water releases, known as "cool mix flows," involve releasing water from deeper, colder layers of the reservoir. These releases have been used in previous years to lower river temperatures and prevent the spawning of smallmouth bass, an invasive species that threatens the humpback chub. However, the deep water layers lack hydropower turbines, meaning such releases would reduce electricity generation.
The decision follows the worst snowpack on record for the Colorado River Basin, which supplies water to over 40 million people across seven US states, tribal nations, and Mexico. It also comes a week after federal officials proposed water cuts for California, Nevada, and Arizona to address the river's dwindling resources.
What the coverage left out
None of the digests from the left-rated outlets mentioned the specific temperature threshold the Bureau of Reclamation uses to consider cool water releases. The centre-rated KMGH report and the Associated Press report both included this detail. The right-rated digest did not mention the humpback chub by name or the species' threatened status.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 16 times, most recently on 7 Aug 2026, 16:45, and will add the sides that appear.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.
A sign reading "keep out" is displayed just upstream of Glen Canyon Dam at Lake Powell, June 8, 2022, in Page, Ariz. (AP Photo/Brittany Peterson, File)
Associated Press News — embedded from source
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
7 rated outlets
- The seven left-rated digests and the Associated Press report led on the decision's impact on the humpback chub, a threatened species. The Associated Press report, the only full article from this side, quoted Matt Rice of American Rivers, who called the decision "disappointing" and warned it could be a "death sentence" for the fish. The report also noted the life-threatening temperatures for the nearby rainbow trout fishery.
- The Associated Press report described the decision as pitting "conservation of the humpback chub against ratepayer costs for electricity." It included the Bureau of Reclamation's statement that cool water releases in 2024 and 2025 had successfully prevented smallmouth bass spawning. The report also carried the utilities' warning that alternative energy purchases could increase electricity bills for customers.
Centre
7 rated outlets
- The seven centre-rated digests and the KMGH report led on the hydropower concerns cited by the Bureau of Reclamation. The KMGH report, the only full article from this side, quoted Andy Colosimo of the Colorado River Energy Distributors Association, who called the decision "the right call" given the river's conditions. The report described the strain on hydropower production and the potential costs to utilities and ratepayers if cool water releases had proceeded.
- The KMGH report included the Bureau of Reclamation's email statement in full and noted the record-low snowpack and the federal proposal for water cuts. It also explained the mechanics of cool mix flows and the risk posed by smallmouth bass to the humpback chub. The report quoted Wayne G. Pullan of the Bureau, who outlined alternative measures to address the smallmouth bass invasion.
Right
1 rated outlet
- The single right-rated digest, from the Madison Courier, led on the decision not to release cool water and the strain on hydropower production. It noted that supporters of cool water releases had argued for their effectiveness but did not include any quotes or additional context beyond the basic facts of the decision.
Read it at the source
16 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
7- Feds sacrifice rare fish in Colorado River to save power for millions (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens Oskaloosa Herald in a new tab)
Oskaloosa Herald — is Oskaloosa Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens St Catharines Standard in a new tab)
St Catharines Standard — is St Catharines Standard biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
7- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens KMGH in a new tab)
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens Washington Top News in a new tab)
Washington Top News — is Washington Top News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens Newsday in a new tab)
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens Cherokee Tribune Ledger News in a new tab)
Cherokee Tribune Ledger News — is Cherokee Tribune Ledger News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens Ottumwa Courier in a new tab)
Ottumwa Courier — is Ottumwa Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens Mid Florida Newspapers in a new tab)
Mid Florida Newspapers — is Mid Florida Newspapers biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Officials will not release cool water from a Colorado River reservoir to protect threatened fish (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
1Not rated
1How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
More in Climate
All Climate →Elsewhere on the site
Politics•4 min readTexas judge blocks ATF from enforcing NFA rules on untaxed firearms
Politics•5 min readUS awards $150m migrant children legal contract to Texas firm with no immigration lawyers
Science & Tech•5 min readTrump-backed US bill could delay right whale protections until 2035, DFO memo warns