Is Scientific Inquirer biased?
Scientific Inquirer is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 2 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Scientific Inquirer biased?
Scientific Inquirer is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Scientific Inquirer left or right?
Scientific Inquirer is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Scientific Inquirer reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Scientific Inquirer. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Scientific Inquirer has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Scientific Inquirer’s own report linked underneath.
Scientists at the Arc Institute in California used an AI model named Evo to design 16 new bacteriophages capable of infecting E. coli. The study, published in Science, excluded human pathogen datasets, ensuring the viruses cannot infect people. Experts warn of biosecurity risks despite potential medical applications.
Scientific Inquirer reported it asDAILY DOSE: AI Creates Entirely New, Viable Viruses From Scratch; Chinese AI Model Escapes Its Testing Sandbox. (opens Scientific Inquirer in a new tab)
Scientists using the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope in Hawaii have captured the most detailed images yet of the Sun’s visible surface, showing vortex-like plasma patterns ranging from 19 to 170 kilometres in diameter. The findings, published in Nature, could improve understanding of coronal mass ejections and space weather.
Scientific Inquirer reported it asTiny vortices discovered on the sun’s surface (opens Scientific Inquirer in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Scientific Inquirer. We asked on 10 August 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Scientific Inquirer.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- scientificinquirer.com
- Seen publishing on
- scientificinquirer.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 2
- Reports listed
- 2
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 7 August 2026
2 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Scientific Inquirer has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 2 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Scientific Inquirer: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 10 August 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 10 August 2026. Ratings pulled 10 August 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Scientific Inquirer publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.