Skip to the story
All stories

Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope captures highest-resolution images of Sun’s surface

New observations reveal swirling plasma patterns that may explain solar storms affecting Earth’s technology

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
This undated image provided by the NSF National Solar Observatory on Monday, Aug. 3, 2026, shows the sun's surface. (Via AP)

What this story says

  • The Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope captured the highest-resolution images to date of the Sun’s visible surface, revealing swirling plasma patterns.
  • The observed vortices range from 19 to 170 kilometres in diameter and were previously predicted but never directly seen.
  • Researchers say the findings, published in Nature on 5 August 2026, may help explain solar storms that disrupt GPS and create auroras.
  • The telescope, located on Maui in Hawaii, was originally used to test its own limits before yielding the unexpected discovery.

Who covered it

Left 29%(61)Centre 53%(113)Right 18%(37)

Percentages are shares of the 211 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 72 of the 283 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

86/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

15/100

283 sources · methodology

Scientists have captured the highest-resolution images yet of the Sun’s visible surface using the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope in Hawaii. The images reveal swirling, vortex-like plasma patterns ranging from 19 to 170 kilometres in diameter. These patterns, described as resembling the swirling skies in Vincent van Gogh’s *The Starry Night*, were observed for the first time at this level of detail.

The telescope, the world’s most powerful solar observatory, was initially used to test its own capabilities. Researchers later realised the images showed the Sun’s outer shell in unprecedented detail. The findings were published on 5 August 2026 in the journal *Nature*. Study co-author Friedrich Wöger, of the National Solar Observatory, said the observations had not been seen at this scale on the solar surface before.

The plasma vortices are caused by magnetised plasma moving at different speeds, creating ripples of instability. Similar phenomena have been observed on Earth and other planets, such as Jupiter and Saturn, but never with this clarity on the Sun. Scientists believe these small-scale processes may drive larger solar events, including coronal mass ejections that can disrupt GPS communications and produce auroras on Earth.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mentioned the size range of the plasma vortices, which left-rated digests such as *Novinky.cz* and unrated outlets like *Haberler* included. The journal *Nature*’s publication of the findings was omitted by all right-rated digests and most centre-rated digests, though it appeared in left-rated digests like *Novinky.cz* and *Spiegel*.

Coverage settled. We checked this 314 times and stopped on 12 Aug 2026, 01:46. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

61 rated outlets

  • The left-rated digests led on the unprecedented detail of the images and their potential to solve long-standing solar mysteries. *Novinky.cz* reported the plasma vortices measured between 19 and 170 kilometres in diameter. *La Presse* and *Spiegel* described the images as revealing a "strange and dynamic facade" of the Sun, with *Spiegel* noting the structures could be part of the solution to a "long-standing puzzle".
  • The *Daily Mirror*’s full report quoted Friedrich Wöger saying the telescope provided a "clearer view" of the small-scale physics powering solar activity. The outlet also included video footage of the feathery patterns and whirlpools, framing the discovery as a breakthrough in understanding the Sun’s "tiny engines". *The Independent*’s digest highlighted the swirling, vortex-like patterns as "never-before-seen" and tied them to the Sun’s larger-scale events.

Centre

113 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated digests focused on the technical achievement and the magnetic mysteries revealed by the images. *CTV News*’ full report led with the telescope’s role in capturing the images and quoted solar physicist Ruizhu Chen comparing the patterns to *The Starry Night*. The outlet also noted the images were originally taken to test the telescope’s limits.
  • *KOMU 8* and *Internewscast* described the images as the "highest resolution view of the sun yet", with *KOMU 8* framing them as revealing "magnetic mysteries". *StudyFinds* emphasised the confirmation of long-predicted whirlpools, stating they had "never been able to see them directly" before. *The Globe & Mail* and *Hawaii Tribune-Herald* digests both highlighted the swirling, vortex-like patterns, with the latter comparing them to Van Gogh’s painting.

Right

37 rated outlets

  • Right-rated digests framed the discovery as a major step forward in understanding the universe. *GB News* described the images as the "sharpest-ever picture of the Sun" and a "major step forward". *Rediff.com* led with the potential to "solve a decades-old solar mystery", while *Korrespondent.net* stated the vortices had previously existed "only in theory".
  • *Focus.de* called the images a "sensation for science" and the "most accurate photos so far". *Daily Sabah* and *Jonesboro Sun* digests both used the phrase "finest detail yet", with the latter noting the "strange feathery patterns" observed. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the specific size range of the vortices or the journal *Nature*’s role in publishing the findings.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope captures highest-resolution images of…?
Of the 211 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 29% are rated left, 53% are rated centre, 18% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 283. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope captures highest-resolution images of… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 211 rated outlets on this story, 29% are rated left, 53% are rated centre, 18% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope captures highest-resolution images of… biased?
Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope captures highest-resolution images of Sun’s surface is one event reported by 283 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which outlets covered Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope captures highest-resolution images of…?
283 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What do the new images of the Sun show?
The images show swirling, vortex-like plasma patterns on the Sun’s visible surface, ranging from 19 to 170 kilometres in diameter. These patterns were captured by the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope and are the highest-resolution images of the Sun’s surface to date. Researchers say they may help explain solar storms that affect Earth’s technology.
Why are these images significant for science?
The images reveal small-scale plasma vortices that were predicted but never directly observed before. Scientists believe these vortices may drive larger solar events, such as coronal mass ejections, which can disrupt GPS communications and create auroras. The findings were published in the journal *Nature* on 5 August 2026.
Which outlets emphasised the potential to solve solar mysteries?
Left-rated digests like *Spiegel* and *La Presse* framed the images as revealing a "long-standing puzzle" or "strange and dynamic facade" of the Sun. Right-rated digests such as *Rediff.com* and *Korrespondent.net* led with the potential to "solve a decades-old solar mystery" or confirm what previously existed "only in theory".
What did the right-rated digests leave out?
None of the right-rated digests mentioned the size range of the plasma vortices, which left-rated digests like *Novinky.cz* included. They also omitted the journal *Nature*’s publication of the findings, which appeared in left-rated digests such as *Novinky.cz* and *Spiegel*.

Read it at the source

283 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

61
Show 53 more

Centre

113
Show 105 more

Right

37
Show 29 more

Not rated

72
Show 64 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Sun's surface imaged in detail | MediaBias News