Skip to the story
All stories

Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war

Tehran examines targeting Bulgaria, Cyprus and submarine cables as tensions rise over Hormuz blockade

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published

What this story says

  • Iranian officials told the Financial Times they are considering strikes on US military targets in Bulgaria and Cyprus if the US renews the war.
  • The US naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in force, and President Donald Trump said on 19 August 2026 there are no negotiations with Iran.
  • Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused the US of escalating pressure to extract concessions not included in the Islamabad memorandum.
  • No left- or centre-rated outlet carried the story, according to the reports below.

Who covered it

Left 26%(6)Centre 13%(3)Right 61%(14)

Percentages are shares of the 23 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 10 of the 33 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

58/100

Craft

55/100

Hype

35/100

33 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 6 of the 23 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Iranian officials have examined attacking US military assets in southeastern Europe if the United States renews the war, the Financial Times reported on 19 August 2026. Two insiders from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps told the newspaper that Bulgaria and Cyprus are potential targets. They also said Iran has assessed striking submarine fibre-optic cables in the Strait of Hormuz if tensions escalate further.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused the US on 18 August 2026 of escalating pressure on Tehran to extract concessions not included in the Islamabad memorandum of understanding. Ghalibaf wrote on social media that the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth were "way out of their league". US President Donald Trump said on 19 August 2026 there are no negotiations with Iran and the naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in force.

The Financial Times reported that Iran’s response would depend on US actions. A source close to the regime said Iran would have "no limits" if the US renewed the war. The Royal United Services Institute research fellow Sidharth Kaushal told the newspaper that Iran’s missile threat to Europe is "real, but limited", as heavier missiles would need to reduce their payload to reach longer distances.

What the coverage left out

None of the 16 reports below, including the eight right-rated digests, mention that the June framework agreement negotiated with Iran has already collapsed. ZN.UA’s full report states the memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran fell apart in July 2026 after Tehran attacked ships in the Strait of Hormuz. No left- or centre-rated outlet carried the story.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 19 Aug 2026, 08:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war
ZN.UA Зеркало недели
Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war
HandelsblattRight

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

6 rated outlets

We have not written our reading of the left coverage of this story. The left-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Centre

3 rated outlets

We have not written our reading of the centre coverage of this story. The centre-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Right

14 rated outlets

  • All eight right-rated digests led on Iran’s threat to strike US military targets in Europe. Arutz Sheva’s full report quoted Iranian officials saying the attack on a US base in Jordan that killed three service members was a "message to Europe". It also carried President Trump’s statement on Truth Social that no negotiations are underway and the naval blockade remains in force.
  • Arutz Sheva named the US officials Ghalibaf criticised, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and quoted his social media post in full. The report also included the denial by Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei of indirect contacts between the US and Iran in Iraqi Kurdistan. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the Islamabad memorandum or the June framework agreement.

Read it at the source

33 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

6

Centre

3

Right

14
Show 6 more

Not rated

10
Show 2 more

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war?
Of the 23 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 26% are rated left, 13% are rated centre, 61% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 33. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 23 rated outlets on this story, 26% are rated left, 13% are rated centre, 61% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war biased?
Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war is one event reported by 33 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war?
33 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What targets is Iran considering if the US renews the war?
Iranian officials told the Financial Times they are examining strikes on US military assets in Bulgaria and Cyprus, and on submarine fibre-optic cables in the Strait of Hormuz. The officials said the response would depend on US actions and could have "no limits" if the war resumes.
What did US President Donald Trump say about negotiations with Iran?
On 19 August 2026, President Donald Trump said on Truth Social there are no negotiations or conversations underway with Iran. He also stated the US naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in full force and the Strait of Hormuz is open and operating.
Which outlets reported on Iran’s threat to strike Europe?
Sixteen outlets carried the story, all of them right-rated or unrated. No left- or centre-rated outlet reported it. The Financial Times broke the story, and eight right-rated outlets ran digests of it, including Arutz Sheva, Cyprus Mail and Australian Financial Review.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Iran considers strikes on US bases in Bulgaria and Cyprus | MediaBias News