Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Conflict & Security60 outlets ran this4 min read

Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war

Tehran examines targeting Bulgaria, Cyprus and submarine cables as tensions rise over Hormuz blockade

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Roaring_Lion

What this story says

  • Iranian officials told the Financial Times they are considering strikes on US military targets in Bulgaria and Cyprus if the US renews the war.
  • The US naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in force, and President Donald Trump said on 19 August 2026 there are no negotiations with Iran.
  • Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused the US of escalating pressure to extract concessions not included in the Islamabad memorandum.
  • No left- or centre-rated outlet carried the story, according to the reports below.

Who covered it

Left 19%(6)Centre 22%(7)Right 59%(19)

Percentages are shares of the 32 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 28 of the 60 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

58/100

Craft

55/100

Hype

35/100

60 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 6 of the 32 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Iranian officials have examined attacking US military assets in southeastern Europe if the United States renews the war, the Financial Times reported on 19 August 2026. Two insiders from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps told the newspaper that Bulgaria and Cyprus are potential targets. They also said Iran has assessed striking submarine fibre-optic cables in the Strait of Hormuz if tensions escalate further.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused the US on 18 August 2026 of escalating pressure on Tehran to extract concessions not included in the Islamabad memorandum of understanding. Ghalibaf wrote on social media that the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth were "way out of their league". US President Donald Trump said on 19 August 2026 there are no negotiations with Iran and the naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in force.

The Financial Times reported that Iran’s response would depend on US actions. A source close to the regime said Iran would have "no limits" if the US renewed the war. The Royal United Services Institute research fellow Sidharth Kaushal told the newspaper that Iran’s missile threat to Europe is "real, but limited", as heavier missiles would need to reduce their payload to reach longer distances.

What the coverage left out

None of the 16 reports below, including the eight right-rated digests, mention that the June framework agreement negotiated with Iran has already collapsed. ZN.UA’s full report states the memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran fell apart in July 2026 after Tehran attacked ships in the Strait of Hormuz. No left- or centre-rated outlet carried the story.

Tags:#IranUSConflict#MiddleEastTensions#NavalBlockade#EuropeMilitaryTargets#StraitOfHormuz

Coverage settled. We checked this 13 times and stopped on 25 Aug 2026, 04:15. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war
ZN.UA Зеркало недели
Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war
HandelsblattRight

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

6 rated outlets

  • The left-rated outlets led on Iran’s reported consideration of strikes against US military targets in Europe. All 12 reports carried the Financial Times account that Tehran weighed attacks on bases in Bulgaria and Cyprus. Eleven digests and CNBC’s full report named these locations as potential targets.
  • Nine digests and CNBC’s report included Iran’s threat to target undersea fibre-optic cables in the Strait of Hormuz. CNBC alone quoted an Iranian military spokesperson’s warning that ships attempting passage would face damage. None of the digests mentioned this statement.
  • Four digests and CNBC’s report noted the UAE’s suspension of trade with Iran following missile launches. CNBC’s report added Trump’s threat to bomb Oman and his order to reduce joint drills with South Korea. The digests did not carry these details.

Centre

7 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated outlets reported that Iran had assessed potential strikes on US military targets in Europe if the US escalated the conflict. All 12 accounts named Bulgaria and Cyprus as possible locations, citing the Financial Times. Ten digests and both full reports included the detail that Iran had also considered attacking submarine fibre-optic cables in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • ANSA and Digi 24, the two outlets that printed full reports, led on the Financial Times’ sourcing: two unnamed figures close to the Iranian regime. Both quoted the same NATO official, who stated the alliance was prepared to defend its members. Neither report included Iranian or US government statements on the record.
  • The outlets carried no disagreement on the facts. None of the digests or reports mentioned a timeline for the Iranian assessment, a specific US action that would trigger retaliation, or any Iranian official by name. The NATO response was included in six digests and both full reports.

Right

19 rated outlets

  • All eight right-rated digests led on Iran’s threat to strike US military targets in Europe. Arutz Sheva’s full report quoted Iranian officials saying the attack on a US base in Jordan that killed three service members was a "message to Europe". It also carried President Trump’s statement on Truth Social that no negotiations are underway and the naval blockade remains in force.
  • Arutz Sheva named the US officials Ghalibaf criticised, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and quoted his social media post in full. The report also included the denial by Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei of indirect contacts between the US and Iran in Iraqi Kurdistan. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the Islamabad memorandum or the June framework agreement.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war?
Of the 32 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 19% are rated left, 22% are rated centre, 59% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 60. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 32 rated outlets on this story, 19% are rated left, 22% are rated centre, 59% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war biased?
Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war is one event reported by 60 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Iran weighs strikes on US bases in Europe if US renews war?
60 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What targets is Iran considering if the US renews the war?
Iranian officials told the Financial Times they are examining strikes on US military assets in Bulgaria and Cyprus, and on submarine fibre-optic cables in the Strait of Hormuz. The officials said the response would depend on US actions and could have "no limits" if the war resumes.
What did US President Donald Trump say about negotiations with Iran?
On 19 August 2026, President Donald Trump said on Truth Social there are no negotiations or conversations underway with Iran. He also stated the US naval blockade of Iranian ports remains in full force and the Strait of Hormuz is open and operating.
Which outlets reported on Iran’s threat to strike Europe?
Sixteen outlets carried the story, all of them right-rated or unrated. No left- or centre-rated outlet reported it. The Financial Times broke the story, and eight right-rated outlets ran digests of it, including Arutz Sheva, Cyprus Mail and Australian Financial Review.

Read it at the source

144 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

16
Show 8 more

Centre

20
Show 12 more

Right

44
Show 36 more

Not rated

64
Show 56 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Conflict & Security

All Conflict & Security →
Camera IconUS President Donald Trump called an Iranian offer to open up the Strait of Hormuz "not good enough". (AP PHOTO) Credit: AAP3 min readUS sends third carrier to Middle East as Trump rejects Iran ceasefireRead storyIm Irak wird der US-Truppenabzug als „Tag der Unabhängigkeit“ gefeiert. © Hadi Mizban/AP/dpa3 min readUS troops leave Iraq, raising security concernsRead storyUS deploys Patriot batteries to Saudi Arabia and Qatar3 min readUS deploys Patriot batteries to Saudi Arabia and QatarRead story

Elsewhere on the site

Iran Foreign Minister Suggests Nuclear Inspectors for Sanctions ReliefPolitics•3 min readIran Foreign Minister Suggests Nuclear Inspectors for Sanctions ReliefФлаг Ирака. Фото: HStocks / istockphoto.comPolitics•2 min readRussia welcomes US troop withdrawal from Iraq
Iran considers strikes on US bases in Bulgaria and Cyprus | MediaBias News