Skip to the story
All stories

California programme provides lawyers for immigrants facing deportation

Volunteer attorneys help navigate a system where half of pending cases lack legal representation

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
California programme provides lawyers for immigrants facing deportation

What this story says

  • A California programme coordinates volunteer lawyers to represent immigrants in deportation hearings, where 52% of pending cases lack legal representation.
  • Immigrants with lawyers win asylum or other relief in 47% of cases, compared with 19% for those without representation, a 2024 study found.
  • The programme operates in Sacramento immigration court, where a single morning’s docket listed 57 unrepresented people.
  • Under the second Trump administration, courts are denying more asylum claims and reducing hearing lead times, increasing the risk of deportation.

Who covered it

Left 33%(6)Centre 56%(10)Right 11%(2)

Percentages are shares of the 18 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .

Trust

74/100

Craft

87/100

Hype

15/100

18 sources · methodology

In Sacramento immigration court, lawyer Kamalpreet Chohan reviewed a morning docket of 57 people scheduled for hearings. None had legal representation. Chohan coordinates a programme that provides volunteer attorneys to immigrants facing deportation, a process where the outcome can determine whether they remain in the United States.

Immigration courts do not guarantee legal representation, unlike criminal courts. Immigrants must either pay for a private lawyer or seek help from non-profit organisations, which often have long waitlists. Of the roughly 3.2 million pending deportation cases in U.S. immigration courts, 52% involve people without a lawyer, according to the Vera Institute of Justice.

A 2024 Congressional Research Service study found that 19% of immigrants without a lawyer won asylum or another form of relief, compared with 47% of those with legal representation. Chohan’s programme, run by the California Immigration Project, offers free assistance to immigrants navigating the court system, including help with asylum applications and referrals to vetted attorneys.

The programme’s work has taken on added urgency under the second Trump administration. Courts are denying more asylum claims, deportation officers have arrested immigrants in court hallways, and hearing lead times have been reduced, increasing the risk of missed hearings and deportation.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention the 52% figure for pending deportation cases without legal representation or the 19% versus 47% success rates for asylum claims with and without lawyers. None of the centre-rated digests except the Washington Top News full report include these figures either.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 9 Aug 2026, 13:01, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

6 rated outlets

  • The two left-rated full reports, from the Associated Press News and Washington Top News, led on the absence of legal representation in immigration courts. Both quoted Chohan’s observation that none of the 57 people on the morning docket had a lawyer. They included the 52% figure for pending deportation cases without representation and the 19% versus 47% success rates for asylum claims with and without lawyers.
  • Both reports quoted Chohan’s statement that immigrants "go into immigration court not knowing what’s happening. They come out not knowing what’s happening." They also carried the account of a Guatemalan man who spent $4,500 on a lawyer who did nothing for his case, and his fear of deportation after being warned by the judge. The Associated Press News report described volunteers from a local anti-ICE resistance group helping immigrants outside the court building.

Centre

10 rated outlets

  • The nine centre-rated digests all noted the programme’s role in helping immigrants navigate the court system. Seven of the nine mentioned the second Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda, with five specifying that courts are playing a key role in that effort. The digests did not include the 52% figure for unrepresented cases or the 19% versus 47% success rates.
  • The full report from Washington Top News, rated centre, carried the same details as the left-rated reports, including the 52% figure, the success rates, and the account of the Guatemalan man who was scammed by a lawyer. It also described the scene inside the courtroom, including Judge Susan Phan’s introduction of Chohan’s services and the signs prohibiting recording.

Right

2 rated outlets

  • The two right-rated digests both mentioned the programme’s role in helping immigrants navigate the court system. Both noted that the stakes are high under the second Trump administration, with one specifying that courts play a key role in the mass deportation agenda. Neither included the 52% figure for unrepresented cases or the 19% versus 47% success rates.

Read it at the source

18 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

6

Centre

10
Show 2 more

Right

2

Not rated

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

California programme provides lawyers for immigrants facing deportation | MediaBias News