Scienmag media bias and reliability
Scienmag is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 9 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is Scienmag biased?
Scienmag is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is Scienmag left or right?
Scienmag is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is Scienmag reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for Scienmag. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What Scienmag has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with Scienmag’s own report linked underneath.
An artificial intelligence model can predict cancer patients' survival risk and biological aging from a single facial photograph. The research, conducted by Mass General Brigham, used a model trained on over 40 million facial images.
Scienmag reported it asFacial AI estimates biological age and predicts cancer survival (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
A planet described as a gas giant has been discovered orbiting a white dwarf star approximately 250 light-years away. This 'second-generation' planet is believed to have formed from material expelled by its dying star, offering new insights into planet formation.
Scienmag reported it asWhite dwarf stars break the colour rule: astronomers find the first truly (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
An international team of scientists has reported that seven of the 16 tracked climate indicators have reached record extremes. The rate of global warming has accelerated significantly, and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are at their highest in two million years, according to the study published in BioScience.
Scienmag reported it asClimate Vital Signs Hit Record Extremes as Scientists Diagnose Rapid (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
A new dinosaur species, Invictibellatrix amberina, has been identified from a fossil found on the Isle of Wight. The long-clawed predator, which lived 120 million years ago, is the first evidence of megaraptorans in Europe and may have viewed humans as prey.
Scienmag reported it asLong-clawed dinosaur from Isle of Wight fossil is first megaraptoran found (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
Jonathan, a 194-year-old Aldabra giant tortoise, has had his genome sequenced by scientists studying the secrets of his longevity. The research identified genetic changes associated with DNA repair and telomere function, offering potential insights into aging.
Scienmag reported it as194-year-old tortoise reveals stable gene switches that may help resist aging: Study (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
A giant cloud near Mars' Arsia Mons volcano forms daily through a process called homogeneous nucleation, where water vapor turns directly into ice. This method has never been observed in a planetary atmosphere before, challenging previous assumptions about cloud formation.
Scienmag reported it asGravity Waves Over a Martian Volcano May Seed Ice Clouds Without Dust (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
Paleontologists have identified Herugavialis cairensis, a new species of extinct crocodile, from 45-million-year-old fossils found in Egypt's Mokattam Formation. The limestone used for the Great Sphinx was quarried from this formation, and a key fossil skull shares a missing snout tip with the monument.
Scienmag reported it asExtinct crocodile with a missing snout tip emerges from the stones of the (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
Microplastics are pervasive in the environment, from ocean depths to soil. Scientists are working on detection methods, with over 200 tons of plastic particles entering soils and waters annually, a significant portion reaching agricultural land and waterways.
Scienmag reported it asDensity separation recovers microplastics from soil despite aging effects (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
A University of Vienna study used brain scans of twelve dogs to show that happy human faces activate the temporal cortex and caudate nucleus, while anger, fear and sadness produce distinct neural patterns. The findings, published in iScience, suggest dogs can differentiate between specific emotions.
Scienmag reported it asDogs Distinguish Human Fear from Sadness, Study Finds (opens Scienmag in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed Scienmag. We asked on 4 October 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for Scienmag.
Where it publishes from
- Publishes from
- Israel
- Official site
- scienmag.com
- Seen publishing on
- scienmag.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 9
- Reports listed
- 9
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
9 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. Scienmag has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 9 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of Scienmag: its report arrived a median of 17 hours after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 2 November 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 26 October 2026. Ratings pulled 4 October 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where Scienmag publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.