eweek.com media bias and reliability
eweek.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. We have seen it on 10 published stories of ours.
The short answers
Is eweek.com biased?
eweek.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum. An outlet rating describes a broad pattern in its output, not every article it publishes.
Is eweek.com left or right?
eweek.com is held by the ratings provider we draw on, and no rater has placed it on the political spectrum.
Is eweek.com reliable?
We do not hold a factual-reliability assessment for eweek.com. A political-leaning label would not answer that question on its own, so we do not infer reliability from left, centre or right.
What eweek.com has been covering
Our account of each story, written from every outlet that ran it, with eweek.com’s own report linked underneath.
Jacob Coxon has resigned from AI company Anthropic, warning that the rapid development of artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to humanity. His departure and warnings have been reported across several outlets, highlighting concerns about AI safety and the race for superintelligence.
eweek.com reported it asAnthropic Researcher Quits, Says AI Labs 'Gambling With Our Lives' (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
A 27-year-old British researcher, Jacob Coxon, has resigned from Anthropic and the AI industry, citing concerns over the rapid, irresponsible development of self-improving superintelligence. He fears this race poses a significant risk to humanity, with some reports suggesting an existential threat by the end of the decade.
eweek.com reported it asAnthropic Researcher Quits: ‘Crunch Time for Humanity’ Warning Puts AI Race Under Scrutiny (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
An Anthropic researcher has warned of a greater than 10% chance of AI causing human extinction in the next ten years. The warning follows a colleague's resignation over concerns about reckless AI development.
eweek.com reported it asAnthropic Researcher Quits: ‘Crunch Time for Humanity’ Warning Puts AI Race Under Scrutiny (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
Jacob Coxon, a researcher formerly with OpenAI and Anthropic, has resigned, stating that leading AI developers are acting irresponsibly and "gambling with our lives." His departure has drawn comparisons to the Skynet scenario from the Terminator film.
eweek.com reported it asAnthropic Researcher Quits: ‘Crunch Time for Humanity’ Warning Puts AI Race Under Scrutiny (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
Apple has launched its first foldable smartphone, the iPhone Duo, at its 'Surprise and Shine' event. The company also introduced the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. This marks the first major product launch under new CEO John Ternus.
eweek.com reported it asApple Event 2026: $1,999 ‘Foldable’ iPhone Duo Takes Center Stage (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
Apple CEO John Ternus posted a cryptic video ahead of the company's expected iPhone 18 Pro unveiling. The video appears to hint at a new variable aperture camera feature for the device, which is set to be announced alongside new Apple Watch models.
eweek.com reported it asApple Event 2026: $1,999 ‘Foldable’ iPhone Duo Takes Center Stage (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
Insilico Medicine's AI-designed drug rentosertib, tested in a small study for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, indicated a reduction in biological age markers. Six independent aging clocks suggested patients treated with the drug appeared biologically younger than those on placebo, with the largest effect seen in the 30mg twice-daily arm.
eweek.com reported it asAI-Generated Drug Shows Early Signs It Could Slow Aging (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
Nvidia released Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, an open-source AI model that runs on a single GPU. The company says it is designed for autonomous agents and can be downloaded, modified and used without charge. Reports disagree on the model’s parameter count.
eweek.com reported it asNvidia Launches Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Switchyard to Cut AI Agent Costs (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
Mark Zuckerberg announced Meta’s $1bn 'Future is for Everyone Fund' to support communities hosting data centres, alongside plans to offer free AI tools to billions. The essay also outlined a vision for personal AI agents and open-source models, while addressing concerns about job displacement and privacy.
eweek.com reported it asMeta Reopens AI Models as Zuckerberg Warns Against ‘Closed’ AI (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
Scientists at the Arc Institute in California used an AI model named Evo to design 16 new bacteriophages capable of infecting E. coli. The study, published in Science, excluded human pathogen datasets, ensuring the viruses cannot infect people. Experts warn of biosecurity risks despite potential medical applications.
eweek.com reported it asScientists Use AI to Design 16 Functional Viruses (opens eweek.com in a new tab)
Who says so
No rating organisation we draw on has placed eweek.com. We asked on 8 September 2026.
How reliably it reports fact
A rating of the newsroom in general, by others, and a different thing from the Trust score we publish on each story, which judges one piece of reporting.
We hold no factual-reliability rating for this outlet.
Who owns it
We hold no ownership record for eweek.com.
Where it publishes from
- Official site
- eweek.com
- Seen publishing on
- eweek.com
- Access
- Free to read
What we have seen ourselves
Counted across the stories this site has published, which is the only denominator a reader can check: every one of them has a page, and every page lists the reports it was written from.
- Stories
- 10
- Reports listed
- 10
- We could read
- 0
- First seen
- 4 August 2026
10 of those reports were paywalled or blocked to us. Our reading of this outlet is built on the 0 we could open, not on everything it published.
A blindspot is measured against one side of the spectrum. eweek.com has not been placed on the spectrum, so there is no side to count against and we publish no figure here.
Across the 10 stories of ours where at least three of the reports we listed carried a time, another outlet was always ahead of eweek.com: its report arrived a median of 2 days after the earliest one we logged.
Measured 25 September 2026. Last seen in a coverage list 15 September 2026. Ratings pulled 8 September 2026.
Think this page is wrong?
The leanings above are published by AllSides, Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check, and we republish them rather than make them. If you think one is misapplied, the strongest place to say so is with the organisation that made it, and every verdict here links to their page.
What we are responsible for is everything else: the ownership chain, where eweek.com publishes from, which of our stories we have listed it on, and whether we have the right publisher at all. Tell us what is wrong and an editor reads it.
Report something wrong on this page
Anything we correct is written up in the public corrections log. We do not publish reader votes as a rating, because an unattributed rating is the thing this site exists to argue against.
Every rating on this page is a named third party’s published work, republished with its author and, where one exists, a link to it. Our own coverage record is the section we measure ourselves. Neither is a judgement of any individual report: those are scored story by story, and the reasoning is on our methodology page.